If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Juro}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Juro

edit

Fresh anti-Hungarian POV edits and vandalism, plus blanked ban notice on User:Juro. Note name similarity to Koooon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). — Mike Gogulski ↗C@T 21:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Inconclusive. But with a twist. There's no IP-relationship between the two of them (though Coolkoon is the same as User:CoolKoon, which isn't at all interesting.) However, Koonjo28 uses open proxies, one of which was a nest of JB196 puppets and sleepers. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for my screwed-up transclusion problem, but I posted another note about this which got removed because of my transclusion error. A personal email from Juro, or someone claiming to be him, pointed the finger at a different banned user, VinceB (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). So, I'd request that the checkuser be continued against that account, if possible. Thank you. — Mike Gogulski ↗C@T 01:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Red X Unrelated --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 01:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I stuffed it over at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VinceB instead. Again, my apologies for my ignorance of procedure. — Mike Gogulski ↗C@T 01:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I don't know how this stuff works either! All thanks to the clerks. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juro

edit
  • Code letter: - Disruptive "throwaway" account used only for a few edits, and edit warring. (reverting)
Evidence
IP possibly does not belong to one person, but all three did nothing, but reverted User:Timur lenk's edits on the same day (dec 21) IP & Klio55), Klio 5 & 55, Klio55 & Juro.
Note
I am pretty sure, that these socks are belonging to an established editor here, and this checkuser will (probably) find the master. I've got only a tip. This behave perfectly fits's to User:Juro, who commented here his revert the (almost) same contrib (revert) as Klio55's (K55 cut out a spam also) as "again", but I didn't find [1], [2] any previous discussions between Juro and Timur lenk in this question. IP and the pretty same usernames acted with the same strong "pro-slovak" and sometimes childish ("anti hungarian") way, as User:Juro frequently acts, but I would be happy, If I'm wrong. Vince hey, yo! :-) 20:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. I believe all the following are the same individual:

The 195 addresses are the same user as well. Essjay (Talk) 05:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.