Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bcamenker

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bcamenker}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Bcamenker

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 01:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Bcamenker (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
BD.Harvest (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Code letter: E
Supporting evidence: Reverts by BD.Harvest: [1], [2], [3], [4], and six more. Reverts by Bcamenker: [5], [6], [7], [8] (the latter three were NOT within 24 hours so Bcamenker did not violate 3RR unless he is also BD.Harvest.)

On MassResistance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), User:BD.Harvest, who has no other edits, edit warred along with User:Bcamenker (who self-identifies as the founder of MassResistance [9]) to change the article to one more friendly to their organization. BD.Harvest has been blocked. I would like this check to confirm whether or not Bcamenker should be blocked as well. Thank you. B (talk) 01:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bcamenker is self-identified as the head of MassResistance. I'd be very surprised if BD.Harvest isn't also involved. I don't think anyone told them about our sock policies, it may make more sense to simply give them a pointer to WP:SOCK. JoshuaZ (talk) 01:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. I also checked Wmdoti (talk · contribs), MassWatch (talk · contribs) and Stellabenna (talk · contribs) based on the history of MassResistance, and they are not technically related but are all located near each other, so meat puppetry is probably a concern with this article. Thatcher 03:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.