Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

September 19

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 19, 2024.

Burin en-bec-de-flute

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Burin en-bec-de-flute

Bruce Weber (reporter)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no discussion or dialogue about a reporter named Bruce Weber at the target article, leaving searchers on a goose chase to read a long page to find nothing about their search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I've not managed to find any coverage of him on en.wp (although as Bruce Weber (photographer) has also had work published in/reviewed by the New York Times it's quite possible I've missed something). Courtesy ping to Jmg38 who removed the entry from the dab page last year. Thryduulf (talk) 00:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Only two links: first was needlessly added in November 2023 to his name originally entered in an en.wiki article in 2005, a classic WP:WTAF that was not looking/needing to be written for the previous 18 years (and an edit should remove his name anyway - an unsupported advertisement for a teaching program that is sufficiently covered by the three properly bluelinked [still unsupported] examples given in the same sentence); second was needlessly added in December 2023 to his name originally entered in an en.wiki article in 2011, a link not needed for the previous 12 years (and an edit should remove the name on this one anyway - replace In his obituary for Peter Yates, Bruce Weber wrote, "Mr. Yates' reputation simply... with His obituary in The New York Times states that his "reputation simply... ). Jmg38 (talk) 01:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Sometimes Wikipedia is not the best way to find info. Johnbod (talk) 03:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and the above. A7V2 (talk) 07:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Box-Office Entertainment Awards

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Box Office Entertainment Awards. Good call (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 00:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "box", "office", or "entertainment" at the target article. Created in 2008 by a suspected sockpuppet of a banned editor. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Boussh

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Boussh

Boston's best variety

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 7#Boston's best variety

Bosch Institute

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "Bosch", and only one mention of "institute" at the target article, this mention being a general usage. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bo’oh’o’wa’er

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article for T-glottalization does not discuss water or "wa'er". This is type-able only as a meme, but the article in question does not discuss memes or any of their implications about Bri'ish pronunciation. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

BlockParty (game portal)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#BlockParty (game portal)

Decco Bishop

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Decco Bishop

Charlotte Bishop

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Charlotte Bishop

Billy Rowan

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Billy Rowan

Cranberry Station

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 00:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem like we have any content on the GTA meaning of this, but there are Terra_Alta,_West_Virginia#History and Ilwaco_Railway_and_Navigation_Company#Cranberry_Station on other uses. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DcVD

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 2#DcVD

Bill Kilday

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This individual might have worked for Niantic since its founding as Keyhole, but Kilday is not mentioned at the target article, so people looking for this topic will not receive any information pertinent to it within the prose. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to eventually write an improvement with the Niantic article to include Bill Kilday. Let's see if I can get something going for a sufficient mention of him in the Niantic article. – The Grid (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just updated the article to have a mention at least. I'll probably add more when I have the time – The Grid (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Subfebrile

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:subfebrile. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately no mention at target; it looks like a soft redirect to wikt:subfebrile is the only option right now. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Big Yud

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "Big Yud" at the target article. Tagged as an r from non-neutral name without mention, as it was upon creation in 2018. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support It is a joke name for Yudkowsky that is not used seriously, and almost certainly not in any RS. I doubt this redirect is helping anyone. Gbear605 (talk) 03:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's a joke name for Yudkowsky, which makes the existence of this redirect extremely funny. No Yuds were harmed in the making of this redirect. (I don't think it counts as non-neutral or offensive; I've only seen it used jokingly or affectionately.) – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A google search shows that this nickname is actually used online, so it's probably useful. Somebody could see people discussing "Big Yud" on a forum and not know who it is, so they might search for that title. I'm also not sure if the name is "non-neutral" or offensive, so I can't comment on that. Di (they-them) (talk) 22:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Name is in use online, target is unambiguous (no one else has this nickname to my knowledge, and if they did, Eliezer would be the WP:PTOPIC). Since the use is in the wild, people will want to look up what it means. Fieari (talk) 01:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Big Blag

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Battletoads (1991 video game). Jay 💬 08:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

R with history. No mention of a "Blag" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just redirect it to Battletoads_(1991_video_game), the article of the first video game. It's expected that the article on the franchise doesn't mention Blag. --uKER (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Big Bear (malt liquor)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 29#Big Bear (malt liquor)

Barnsley Chop

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Lamb and mutton#Cuts. Legoktm (talk) 00:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "Barnsley" at the target article, unclear relationship to the target besides that they are both a form of "chop". Utopes (talk / cont) 23:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Banapassport

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Banapassport

Banana Guard

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Banana Guard

Baduizm World Tour

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27#Baduizm World Tour

Baba Saheb Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27#Baba Saheb Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology

All my life, it's like I'm always just about to fall off the edge of the world's tallest building. I stopped falling the second I saw you.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 19:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "all my life", or any other part of this quote, at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

East Hill, Wisconsin

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 00:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These do not appear at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Misha Gromov

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mikhael Gromov (mathematician). Legoktm (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "Misha" is a standard shortening of Mikhail in Russian, but I can't find any source referring to the aviator with this shortening, so this seems to unambiguously refer to Mikhael Gromov (mathematician). (If this were to be kept though, then Michael Gromov should be retargeted to the disambig as well since it is only more likely to be ambiguous.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dendrolaelaps

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remaining 115 titles
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

List of ~120 titles from CAT:RAW. All of these are species that are listed on List of Dendrolaelaps species, apparently. However, each of these is a redirect to Dendrolaelaps, which mentions none of these. There may indeed be procedurally generated history in each, from User:qbugbot, among possibly others. Most of which are no longer mentioned in the sources, hence they've been converted into redirects. I am not an expert on these species, but I am an "expert" in knowing these are not useful redirects to Dendrolaelaps, and mislead readers with no current information at the target article. Notably, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 9#Dendrolaelaps aberratus closed as delete. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of Dendrolaelaps species maybe? Note that some entries there are redlinks, though there might be a case for unlinking the whole list. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4:, many of these were created as redirects. Letting you know I have just added the previous discussion to this, where one species closed as delete. While most of these were created as redirects, some became auto-generated articles. However, they were BLAR'd after "no longer being in the cited reference", apparently. Dendrolaelaps langi is such an example. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Many of these aren't mentioned at List of Dendrolaelaps species, and some that are mentioned are not currently accepted species according to GBIF (which is the source for the species list). The species list could stand to be updated (and possibly merged to the genus article). These redirects can be deleted per WP:REDYES. Plantdrew (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

JSTC

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to John Spendluffe Technology College. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Apparently also refers to John Spendluffe Technology College. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Four Fs (evolution

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing parenthesis makes this an unlikely search term; this is not how we do disambiguation. External links should not cause us to create unnatural, otherwise inappropriate titles. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Now Dance 89 - 20 Smash Dance Hits (The 12" Mixes

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not contain a closing parentheses. A common mistake, but unlikely search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Picton Airport (New Zealand

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing a closing redirect parenthesis. Seems to have been an intentional move? I can't parse it. I'd like to speedy it though, little history. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:RDAB. Only history was a page move. (Also, @Utopes, it's not missing a closing redirect, it's missing a closing parenthesis.) Duckmather (talk) 00:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ty for catching lol ;) Utopes (talk / cont) 00:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Devastator (film

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing a closing parentheses. A common mistake. Was converted into a redirect instead of being deleted. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yippie-yi-o, yippie-yi-yay, ghost riders in the sky

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26#Yippie-yi-o, yippie-yi-yay, ghost riders in the sky

And I think to myself: 'What a wonderful world.'

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "think" or "myself". This lyric is not discussed at the target page. People using this search term would already know the song title as it's baked into the redirect, and this is an implausible way of searching for such a song, as nobody would expect the song title to contain a colon and singular apostrophes around the "what a wonderful world", plus a period. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Everybody in the whole cell block was dancing to the Jailhouse Rock

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While this lyric does contain "Jailhouse Rock", that is more of a reason that people who type this, already know what the song is called. To that end, typing out the full lyric implies that they're looking for content related to the lyric. Unfortunately, this lyric is not mentioned at the target page. No mentions of "everybody", "cell", "block", "cellblock", "cell block", or "dancing" (the only use of "dancing" in the article, is as a category). Utopes (talk / cont) 20:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got till it's gone

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27#Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got till it's gone

All the young dudes carry the news, boogaloo dudes carry the news

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the word "boogaloo" at the target article. This lyric is not discussed. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

I don't care what people say: rock 'n' roll is here to stay

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of anything relating to "I don't care what people say". Nobody would type this, place a colon, and then remove the "a" and "d" and type 'n' instead of and. While people might say "rock n roll", nowhere in the article is this abbreviation used. Coupled with the first half, this phrase is not discussed at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

I've been locked inside your heart-shaped box for weeks

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the word "locked" at the target article, and the mention of "weeks" is not in the context of the lyric. People looking for this subject will be misled, as it's not a lyric we cover at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete as undiscussed, and look into whether or not that counts as a [HeartShapedObject] for the purposes of becoming a big shot cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

I've been through the desert on a horse with no name, it felt good to be out of the rain

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of rain at the target article, totally implausible to type this entire thing when it contains the song name in question. With no material about this lyric at the target article, this is a confusing redirect which misleads readers who think we cover this subject when we do not. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

I wrote it on the Starter cap

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of a "starter cap" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

'Cause ain't no such things as halfway crooks

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26#'Cause ain't no such things as halfway crooks

Wu-Tang is for the children

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27#Wu-Tang is for the children

Two to the one from the one to the three

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You reposted this redirect on the wrong Wikipedia (not mentioned). Utopes (talk / cont) 17:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per "those aren't even the right lyrics, come on!!" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Don't you wanna grow up to be just like me

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this lyric at the target article. It is much more plausible for readers to be using the song name as a search term to reach this, or investigating elsewhere to find out what song this comes from, in order to answer the FAQ about the song & lyric combo, which Wikipedia is not a FAQ. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Check baby check baby one two three four

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "check baby" at the target page; this lyric isn't mentioned, and I don't foresee people using a countdown as a search term to reach the page about the target song. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ass so fat that you could see it from the front

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this lyric at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

I take seven kids from Columbine, stand 'em all in line, add an AK-47, a revolver, a nine

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Columbine controversy is mentioned, with a section discussing the lyric. However, this is not the lyric. The lyric says "AK-47, a revolver, and a .9", and starts with "I'll take" instead of "I take". That said, there is no mention of AK-47s or revolvers at the target article, either, so this title is spelled out well beyond what is covered and listed at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

I'm Slim Shady, yes I'm the real Shady, all you other Slim Shadies are just imitating

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27#I'm Slim Shady, yes I'm the real Shady, all you other Slim Shadies are just imitating

Dr. Dre's dead, he's locked in my basement

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no mention of a basement at the target article; people using this particularly lyric will be disappointed to find no material related to the content of their lyrical search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Guess who's back, back again

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear at the target article. Incidentally, this is also a lyric for Houdini, but mentioned at neither article. This isn't a helpful search term for people looking for Eminem topics, as they'd either search the song names, or search his. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Redirects from sufficiently well-known song lyrics can be useful even if the lyric in question is not mentioned in the article. This particular lyric is part of the intro to one of Eminem's best-known singles, making it reasonably likely that it's well-known enough to be a useful redirect. I don't personally think the reoccurrence in Houdini is likely to cause substantial confusion; the lyric was likely added to Houdini in order to deliberately reference its previous use in Without Me, which would further suggest that the lyric is recognizable both on its own terms and as something associated with the destination. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. -1ctinus📝🗨 15:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang1

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Template:Lang1

I said a hip, hop, the hippie the hippie to the hip hop, and you don't stop

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the lyric of the song, it goes "to the hip-hip-hop and you don't stop". But even so, this is not a likely method of reaching this title. People who want to find the song that goes like this, can try a search engine built for such. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hey girls, hey boys, superstar DJs, here we go!

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of superstar DJs at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire, we don't need no water, let the motherfucker burn! Burn, motherfucker, burn!

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 19:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible to use the full length of the chorus to reach the article for the song, when this can be achieved by typing "the roof is on fire". Whether or not the article is known for its song, we don't make these redirects unless there is relevant, sourced and structured content at the target page, else people using this search term will be confused where the content is related to their search. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BURN- BURN TO THE GROUND- BURN TO TH- BURN per nom, and potentially daftify as well cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 23:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Mac Dad'll make you jump, jump, Daddy Mac'll make you jump jump

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27#The Mac Dad'll make you jump, jump, Daddy Mac'll make you jump jump

Death Row's in tha muthaphukkin house

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not listed in the target article, and definitely not at this spelling (is missing a "c", apparently?) Utopes (talk / cont) 17:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per "the title already has a fuck word, you don't need to spell it differently to look cool". unsure on whether this would actually count as a tyop, but it's implausible and undiscussed nonetheless cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Meditation

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27#Wikipedia:Meditation

Thibault Perissat

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. wbm1058 (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a likely needed redirect BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the (new) target of the current target (redirect) - 2024 World Series of Poker.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

EYS

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 20:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible target. One meaning of this initialism seems to be Eu Yan Sang, though there are likely others. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The great edit war

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page it redirects to has no mention of any edit war. Probably a reference to some edit war on the page, but I don't think that warrants a redirect, and there's been many other big edit wars anyways. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there's a mainspace List of edit wars on Wikipedia but none of them is singled out as "the great" one (and Caesar salad is not listed). Belbury (talk) 11:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

FuBl 2

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move to FuBL 2 and retarget to Luftwaffe radio equipment of World War II. wbm1058 (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Is this referring to the differently capitalised "FuBL 2" at Luftwaffe_radio_equipment_of_World_War_II#Navigation_and_direction_finding? 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, mwwv converse∫edits 11:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Verenigd Koninkrijk

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Dutch exonyms#United Kingdom. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete per WP:RLANG – Dutch name for the United Kingdom. Cremastra (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, mwwv converse∫edits 11:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ḙ

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. It has been 14 days since the last input to this discussion, and two relists did not elicit new opinions. It appears the fate of the redirects is linked to the yet uncreated circumflex below. For now, refining the redirects to the newly created section #circumflex_below, as an improved target. Jay 💬 14:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These were nominated in 2010 as part of a WP:TRAINWRECKy nomination already, but they are not mentioned at the target, which barely talks about a circumflex below (note that this is currently a red link) at all. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:22, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, mwwv converse∫edits 11:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sufferin' succotash

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Succotash#In popular culture. wbm1058 (talk) 16:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A catchphrase not mentioned at the target article. People interested in reading about this character would be more likely to search for the character. There is no content about this phrase here, and Wikipedia is not a search engine for "who said this line". Utopes (talk / cont) 17:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep [Changed to retarget below]: What's the problem and what's your suggestion? I don't see a problem here, and "who said this line" is a helpful service. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The problem is as described above (i.e. catchphrases not mentioned at target articles are problematic and misleading due to inherent lack of context and confusion caused for readers). My suggestion is to delete, aligning with past precedents that: "phrase, lyric, and quote redirects that point to articles where they are not mentioned are misleading and cause confusion for readers"; such was the result for a sizeable set of RfDs nominated early this year: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 12#It's not personal. It's strictly business. In this situation, there is currently no mention of any "suffering" being undergone by anyone, much less the variation of "sufferin'" used as a search term dropping the "g". "Succotash" is also not mentioned nor alluded to in the article at this time. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess your italics indicate a quote from somewhere, and there must've been some prior discussion of this issue that I'm not familiar with. I thought the threshold for a redirect was lower than it would be for a DAB (i.e., WP:DABMENTION). In my personal experience, people sometimes remember a catchphrase but can't remember the name of the person who said it or what show it was in, and just need a little reminder. "To the Moon, Alice!" —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:18, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Apologies for the confusion; the italics was a retelling of my nomination statement, which in turn summarizes some past discussions about unmentioned "r from catchphrases" and "r from lyrics".
    I fully agree that a tool for searching a catchphrase in order to find the source is a great function, but it more suitable for open-ended search engines such as Google or Youtube which aggregate differently. Doing so on Wikipedia would only work for an exact title match of existing content, and nothing will appear in the built-in search engine for those without mentions in the article. To the Moon, Alice! is an example of a suitable r from catchphrase, as it's a phrase that receives a mention in the plot section as well as allusions in the legacy section (that is if this quote is a version of "bang zoom straight to the moon", which is the aspect discussed and referred to here). Utopes (talk / cont) 19:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    To push back on that a little, just because Google (or the Youtube site it operates) might usually do a better job of finding a subject doesn't mean a search string is not worth trying to have at all. Wikipedia is less spammy (among other considerations), and its search box sometimes leads to what you're looking for if no one deletes the redirect at (or similar to) the string you type. "Sufferin' succotash" is an extremely famous phrase for this character, and is only two words, so it wouldn't have a lot of variation in what people would type to look for it. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, mwwv converse∫edits 11:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget back to Succotash#In popular culture, which seems to be the best target-- it mentions both Daffy and Sylvester's usage of the phrase, as well as the time Roman Reigns said it in WWE Smackdown, and also, the reader can scroll up and find out what the sweet heck succotash even is. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 06:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chrysolith

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 3#Chrysolith

Jisan

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 3#Jisan

Palestine Israel

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Israel and Palestine. The new disambiguation page seems to be the most popular, and the argument that this is a plausible search term is compelling. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Classic WP:XY. Delete. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (disclaimer: creator of both); same reasoning as Fieari and backed by data from Thryduulf; plus WP:XY does state that in some cases redirects should point to a location in which both topics are discussed. This is the closest to a perfect target we can get anyways. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 15:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is an example on WP:XY, search results would be better here as who knows what specific page they would be looking for. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
XY is not a reason to delete when we have content that deals with both X and Y (the combination, interaction or intersection), which we do in this case. When it's not clear which of multiple possible articles someone is looking for we use disambiguation and set indexes. Thryduulf (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Does WP:XY apply here? If it does, is it still a reason to delete in this case? (see Thryduulf's comment in response to Traumnovelle). Is the search term ambiguous? More discussion is needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Barney and Brothers

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 13:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find Barney and Brothers on the page or on Google. If there are sources please let me know and I'll withdraw this nomination Dr vulpes (Talk) 09:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is just a bad translate of title from korean language... it's suppose to be Bunny and the Brothers. And forgot to redirect it to the existing page Bunny and Her Boys. Aidillia (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Evil Dead 4

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Evil Dead (2013 film). ✗plicit 14:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this redirect fits better for Evil Dead (2013 film). Thoughts? Mr slav999 (talk) 08:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget: as per nom. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 12:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iweh Pascal Odinaka(Poco Lee)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Speedy deletion criterion R3 & criterion X3. JBW (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Iweh Pascal Odinaka already exists, so I see no reason that this redirect without a space before the "(" needs to exist. GTrang (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chima big brother

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 15:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused redirect Kingsmasher678 (talk) 04:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Post (X)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) mwwv converse∫edits 15:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused redirect Kingsmasher678 (talk) 04:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw: Sorry y’all, still learning this XfD venue. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Amu TV

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Amu Television. ✗plicit 14:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subject isn't even mentioned in the target article. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 04:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Japanese opera

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27#Japanese opera

God of the New Testament

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26#God of the New Testament

God of the Old Testament

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26#God of the Old Testament

Santa Maria Beach

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26#Santa Maria Beach

Back O' Beyond

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 1#Back O' Beyond

List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters can not be deleted here as it has over 5,000 edits to the page. I believe a steward has to take care of this. Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no list at the target. The former page could be moved to characters in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (or Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters, if that is deleted beforehand) to preserve page history. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Considering that there are over a dozen RFD discussions that are relisted, waiting for this discussion to close, it's disappointing that this one has gotten so few arguments stating what editors want to happen with these pages and so it must be relisted, too. Where are all of the RFD regulars?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jizzy B.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target; not sure if the content we have at Charlie_Murphy_(actor)#Career is enough for a redirect. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ran Fa Li

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear anywhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jimmy Hernandez

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 1#Jimmy Hernandez

Zero (Grand Theft Auto)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, and a bit difficult to immediately see whether we have any content on this one. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Editor asking for a delay until a different RFD discussion is closed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_19&oldid=1250304304"