Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…I want help with developing the article further and raising it to GA status.
Thanks, Srinivas 11:43, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Here is my quick take -
- Intro and Early life sections (and some others, but these are the worst) are lacking in grammar and punctuation.
- Debut section starts off with a ref to another section, does not stand by itself. Whole first para really confusing. No source for Consenting Adults.
- Film career section seems very complete; did not read it all yet.
- Many citations lack publisher data and dates. A few of the sources may not be considered reliable.
- It could use sections about off-scrceen work.
BollyJeff || talk 21:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Everything else can be fixed. But as far as off-screen work is considered, we hardly have anything to talk of. Srinivas 16:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)