Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/FOURRFC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was close as moot, as I have archived the discussion. Bencherlite ^Talk 10:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/FOURRFC

Mostly redundant to current RFC at WT:FOUR; does not follow tips at RFC (too stammering, too long, and too biased). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - obviously you and your crew think my alternate RFC is biased. It is no more biased than yours, but actually allows for discussion rather than conflated issues.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Holy mother of God, are you that far up your Millenium Park to think that statements like you just put all over Wikipedia (example) where you write "The first [RFC, opened by Khazar2 ] is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. ... Please look at the second one, which I think is much better", is neutral, and that statements such as "Should this project's criteria (and the eligibility of articles for those criteria) be determined by community consensus or by an elected project director?" and "Should this project allow users to opt out of having qualifying articles awarded and listed?" are not neutral? Tony, I'm beginning to think an ANI post under "competence is required" may be necessary to keep you from further damaging your own reputation. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Issues are more clearly presented in this RfC. GregJackP Boomer! 07:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Totally unproductive RfC. I think that the user conduct issues are more significant here though. Nick-D (talk) 08:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.