Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 January 16

< January 15	January 17 >

January 16

File:Wadems2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image has no encyclopedic value. It has been overly edited and therefore has no use on Wikipedia. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wadems3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image has no encyclopedic value. It has been overly edited and therefore has no use on Wikipedia. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WalkerLA.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image has no encyclopedic value. Image has obviously been edited to have information removed and therefore has a low quality. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wally Page Rotterdam Bar 2007 small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a smaller duplicate of File:Wally Page Rotterdam Bar 2007.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pissysmurf.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a little odd (read: gross) and I believe has no encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Waterparkcollegecrest2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a smaller size duplicate pf File:Waterparkcollegecrest.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weapon-on-chasis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a lower quality duplicate of File:Weapon-on-chasis(sm).JPG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weatherby-lake-housesx600.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a smaller duplicate of File:Weatherby-lake-houses.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Webdevwkstn.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:Webdevwkstn.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Welcome user akira otomo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image has no encyclopedic value and really just has no effective use on Wikipedia. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WeldingImage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a slightly different duplicate of File:WeldingImage1.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weltmap.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a poor quality duplicate of File:Weltmap2.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Westall2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Image is a smaller duplicate of File:Westall4.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whiskey Ring 02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser duplicate of File:Whiskey Ring 03.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine on the deleting this image. Thanks. Cmguy777 (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White Dragon of Mercia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Nominator withdrew their nomination. Furthermore, no arguments to delete were presented, other than the nomination itself. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a duplicate of File:White Dragon of Mercia.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment which is the preferred format, JPG or PNG? 76.65.128.132 (talk) 12:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and delete the JPG file instead. The JPG file looks bad because of lossy compression. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it is higher quality and a smaller storage size than the .jpg (which should be deleted). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Withrawn per above discussion. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:58, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White Spacer551x31.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image has no purpose on Wikipedia. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this should be replaced by a 1x1 pixel clear GIF or PNG file. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 12:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? --Stefan2 (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White throated Kingfisher ashayh.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused imaged is a slightly different duplicate of File:White throated Kingfisher2 ashayh.JPG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wiki TBI2-t.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Image is a smaller duplicate of File:Wiki TBI2.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wiki TBI1-t.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a smaller duplicate of File:Wiki TBI1.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WikiFigEsSizeFunction.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality duplicate of an SVG image: File:WikiFigEsSizeFunction.svg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikinonconform.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Image is a smaller copy of File:Wikinonconform.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wayne Criss.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user's image; no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears to be a fan photo. Sumanch (talk) 07:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paparazziblaine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user's image; no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Looks like another fan photo. Sumanch (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Equation for relative humidity.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Equation can be written in LaTeX like this:
$RH={\frac {p_{s}}{p_{0}}}\times 100\%=S\times 100\%$
updated Condensation (aerosol dynamics) with the LaTeX eqn.
BTW, I messed up a little; well a lot. I used ~~~~~ instead of the date in the template that created a ffd section here → Wikipedia:Files for deletion/03:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC) Sumanch (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Satpressure.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Equation can be written in LaTeX like this:
$\ln {p_{s} \over p_{0}}={\frac {2\sigma M}{RT\rho \cdot r_{p}}}$
updated Condensation (aerosol dynamics) with the LaTeX eqn. Sumanch (talk) 04:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Freemol2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Equation can be written in LaTeX like this:
$I={\frac {\pi a^{2}}{k_{b}}}\left({\frac {P_{\infty }}{T_{\infty }}}-{\frac {P_{A}}{T_{A}}}\right)\cdot C_{A}\alpha$
updated Condensation (aerosol dynamics) with the LaTeX eqn. Sumanch (talk) 04:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Continuum2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Equation can be written in LaTeX like this:
$I_{cont}\sim {\frac {4\pi aM_{A}D_{AB}}{RT}}\left(P_{A\infty }-P_{AS}\right)$
updated Condensation (aerosol dynamics) with the LaTeX eqn. Sumanch (talk) 04:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Transition12.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Equation can be written in LaTeX like this:
$I=I_{cont}\cdot {\frac {1+K_{n}}{1+1.71K_{n}+1.33K_{n}^{2}}}$
updated Condensation (aerosol dynamics) with the LaTeX eqn. Sumanch (talk) 04:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Transition1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image of an equation that is not being used. Please see the previous ffds I have posted for similar files. This equation can be generated very easily. I guess User:Stefy created these files when LaTeX was not supported in WP. Sumanch (talk) 04:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Quaff.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user's image (?); no other encyc use foreseen Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mentmore groundfloor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I woul dhave thought that saying : "plan drawn by me for use in futire article; this is a prototye uploaded to see how it looks in scale and size. {{"PD-self}} Keep local) made it perfectly obvious to even the most stupid what the image is required for. Furthermore, it links to an unfinished page in user space. Giacomo Returned 09:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry (I someho missed this page among bot-generated galleries) Bulwersator (talk) 09:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mentmore overhead 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perfectly good description, now go and read it! Giacomo Returned 09:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry (I someho missed this page among bot-generated galleries) Bulwersator (talk) 09:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MentmoreRooflessexpirement.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I woul dhave thought that saying : "plan drawn by me for use in future article; . {{"PD-self}} Keep local) made it perfectly obvious to even the most stupid what the image is required for. Furthermore, it links to an unfinished page in user space. Giacomo Returned 09:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry (I someho missed this page among bot-generated galleries) Bulwersator (talk) 09:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Matt Doudera.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manzetti Mechanism.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image. No forseen use. MGA73 (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Was obviously never used in an article. --Leyo 14:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Salinosporamide A building blocks.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image. No forseen use. MGA73 (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The image was replaced in the article Salinosporamide A. --Leyo 14:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hbf4.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image. No forseen use. MGA73 (talk) 14:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Replaced in Fluoroboric acid by SVG version. --Leyo 14:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:7-PET.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image (except for User:Multichill/Free uploads/2011-06-15). MGA73 (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced in 7-PET. --Leyo 14:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Supermushroom.png

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 February 7.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC #1 and #8. The concept of a mushroom power-up is not copyrightable (as copyright protects expressions and not ideas), and the image could be replaced with a power-up from a free game (like the egg from SuperTux) without a significant harm to the reader's understanding of the concept. RJaguar3 | u | t 17:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I contend this deletion - the alternative you propose (the egg from SuperTux) has nowere the same cultural impact as the Mario's mushroom. Now if you could find an alternate free mushroom power-up that has been portrayed in merchandising througout the whole world, providing references that it will be instantly recognized as a gaming power-up then your deletion proposal would have same weight, but that's simply not the case. See also the related rationale for keeping the file File:Pacman-cutscene.png, see discussion below.Diego (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, is there any other free image replacement that has been described as "the quintessential power-up" by a reliable source? Diego (talk) 23:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that File:Supermushroom.png fails #1 and #8 of WP:NFCC. I've given rationales based on the popularity and historic relevance of the images that no other free image could met, and have sourced them accordingly.

#1 (No free equivalent) requires that the free replacement would serve the same encyclopedic purpose; the SuperTux power up would not provide the same encyclopedic purpose and would not be of "acceptable quality". Unless you can provide references of free images with equivalent cultural impact and historic relevance, the existence of power-up free images is not enough to claim that #1 is not met - they would simply not "have the same effect".

As for #8 (Contextual significance), again File:Supermushroom.png is THE number one representation of the power-up. It's presence as the most significant example should go uncontested unless very good sources are provided to the contrary. Diego (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since I don't think I stated my position clearly, I will re-present it.

The first alternative is to use a free drawing or illustration of a mushroom, with the current caption (possibly modified to say something like "A stylized mushroom, like the one shown here, allows Mario to become Super Mario. It is one of the most well-known power-ups in all of video games"). While we cannot replicate the exact design of the Super Mario mushroom or replicate essential characteristics of it, there is no copyright in the concept of a mushroom itself, even if it is strongly associated with Super Mario Bros. Because this image serves as a free replacement for the nonfree image that does not sacrifice the contribution to enhancing the reader's understanding of the article, the image in question fails NFCC #1 and #8

The second alternative is to use a power-up from SuperTux, such as the egg or fire flower. Because SuperTux is licensed under the GPL, it is possible to create free screenshots. I argue that it is not necessary to show the most-recognizable power-up; rather, any suitable illustration that clearly demonstrates the concept will suffice. In light of such a substitute image, the current image fails NFCC #1 and #8.

If either alternative is correct, the image fails NFCC. Since it is nonfree not being used elsewhere, it should be deleted accordingly. RJaguar3 | u | t 17:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point, I'm afraid I'm the one who hasn't stated my position clearly. I'll try to explain it with a metaphor. Suppose we apply your argument to Andy Warhol's Campbell's Soup I: "the concept of a can of soup is not copyrightable". What you say is akin to replacing Andy Warhol's painting with a stylized can of soup, and say that "a can of soup like this one was made famous by Andy Warhol". Either that, or replace it with a freely licensed photography of a supermarket aisle with a pile of cans.

tl;dr version - compare it with the portrait of a smiling woman. Assuming it was not yet in the public domain, should we replace that one in this article with a free photograph of a woman with a smile and say "he painted one of these"?

In summary, the encyclopedic value of showing Super Mario Bros. Mushroom, and not any other mushroom or power-up, is because of the impact in popular culture of that particular power-up, that no other one can reflect. Using the words of the Campbell's Soup fair use rationale: it "shows how the image depicted is familiar to the general public". It makes no sense to replace one cultural item with another obscure one that serves the same functional role; the first one has encyclopedic value and is significant to the topic on its own, which makes it irreplaceable. None of your alternatives is correct because both neglect a part of the topic that should be represented in the article. Diego (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Warhol's Campbell's Soup cans paintings can satisfy NFCC on Andy Warhol. Replacing such an image with a mock-up of a soup can would not be a Warhol work and would thus fail in accurately depicting the work of the artist who is the subject of the article. Likewise, the article on Surrealism includes a picture reproduction of Magritte's The Treachery of Images, which is nonfree. There, the justification for including the image is to accurately show the contribution of a major painter who was historically important in surrealism. Further, in History of Eastern role-playing video games, several non-free images are used, because the games that are significant to the history of the development of the eastern RPG are not free and are illustrated in the article to call out the distinguishing features. However, compare Video game genres, which has no nonfree images, even though there are many iconic games in each genre (Final Fantasy in RPGs, for example). Instead, screenshots from free games are used to illustrate the article. This is a close case, I realize, but I think that power-up is closer to Video game genres than History of Eastern role-playing video games. Games with power-ups are a dime a dozen, and an image from such a game that is free serves the purpose of showing to the reader what a power-up looks like in a game. Certainly, if the Mario mushroom somehow ended up in the public domain, I would choose that as the image; as it stands though, it is nonfree and replaceable by a free image. Even if that free image is less desirable, it still effectively serves the purpose of illustrating to the reader what a power-up looks like in a video game. RJaguar3 | u | t 21:09, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EDITED TO ADD: As to your argument for why we cannot replace the Mario mushroom with a drawing of a mushroom, what is so significant about the expressive design of the Mario mushroom such that it is absolutely necessary to illustrate the article on power-ups? Would not a free drawing of a mushroom with a suitable caption call to mind the same well-recognized power-up without being non-free? RJaguar3 | u | t 21:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No,
A generic mushroom shape in popular culture is metaphorically associated to something else,
Your point about Video game genres would be more appropriate if we had a separate article for "History and cultural impact of power ups". If we had it I would agree to move this image to the top of that article. Since it doesn't exist, this one must cover that aspect and thus has to show the cultural impact of the Mario's Mushroom. Thus your points about art are applicable ("a mock-up of a [mushroom] would not be a [Supermario's power-up]" and "including the image is to accurately show the contribution of a major [gameplay element] which was historically important in [videogames]").
At most there's an argument that a direct screenshot of Super Mario would represent this historic item better than the official promotional material provided by Nintendo. But it would also be non-free so it means nothing to this discussion, and I prefer this image since it's the one used by the source that references it as significant.

and,

5. So what happens when we disagree about the level to which #1 and #8 are satisfied? Diego (talk) 06:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.- You're right that a free image would be enough to represent the abstract concept of a power-up. My position is that this is not enough to replace the current image, because the article's image must also represent the history and context of the concept. Diego (talk) 07:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the file deleted? The discussion has not been closed and there is no consensus to delete. Diego (talk) 06:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pacman-cutscene.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) RJaguar3 | u | t 20:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC #1 and #8. While the description is correct that there are unlikely to be any free screenshots of power-ups from games circa 1980, the article does not go into detail about the history of power-ups. Rather, the image appears in a section about offensive power-ups. Consequently, the loss of this image, or the replacement of this image by a similar image from a free game or a mock-up would not harm the reader's understanding of the subject. RJaguar3 | u | t 17:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC) The image has since been added to Cutscene, where it appears to satisfy WP:NFCC. There being no reason to delete the file anymore, I close the discussion with the intent to open up the issue of the image's use on the Power-up page at WP:NFCR. RJaguar3 | u | t 20:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that both File:Supermushroom.png and File:Pacman-cutscene.png fail #1 and #8 of WP:NFCC. I've given rationales based on the popularity and historic relevance of both images that no other free image could met, and have sourced them accordingly.

#1 (No free equivalent) requires that the free replacement would serve the same encyclopedic purpose; the SuperTux power up and a recent cutscene would not provide the same encyclopedic purpose. Unless you can provide references of free images with equivalent cultural impact and historic relevance, the existence of power-up and cutscene free images is not enough to claim that #1 is not met - they would simply not "have the same effect".

As for #8 (Contextual significance), again File:Supermushroom.png is THE number one representation of the power-up. It's presence as the most significant example should go uncontested unless very good sources are provided to the contrary. There is a valid case to remove File:Pacman-cutscene.png from power-up as long as history of power-ups is not included in the article (though history is mentioned in the images caption, and PacMan is mentioned in the section). Since your deletion request, I've included the image in cutscene where it is contextually significant (discussed in the article's text) and no equivalent image can be provided (Pac-man is directly discussed), so the image should not be deleted even if it is removed from power-up. Diego (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diego (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Headshot web.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned portrait image of a person without an article. Quibik (talk) 17:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Purple Rainbows Band Icon Small.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring the possible copyright issues of using a bands/Media group logos. These image are unused (except for a userpages that are also up for deletion) and have no encyclopedic value as these bands/Media groups don't even have a page as these bands fails WP:Band. Additionally uploader probably has a WP:COI issue and most of his other image are also up for deletion.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 18:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Willie Nelson ~(Blue Jean)WM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image has mega copyright tag on it even though its been release to the public domain. With the obnoxious box in the center it has no encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windows version Line up.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:Windows version tree.png -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wlan arch.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality, slightly different version of File:Wlan arch.png -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Woodsball marksman 03pl.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a mirror duplicate of File:Woodsball marksman 03.JPG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Woodsball marksman 08pl.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a mirror duplicate of File:Woodsball marksman 08.JPG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Worldmapidea10.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a near duplicate of File:Worldmapidea11.PNG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wot logo small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a very small duplicate of File:Wot logo largel.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WPLEB.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser duplicate of the SVG image: File:WPLEB.svg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WPLTLBTF.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:WPLTLBTF.PNG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WPLTLUTF.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:WPLTLUTF.PNG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wpsclogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:Wpsclogo.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wynberg Boys' High School Badge .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality near duplicate of File:Wynberg Boys High School Badge.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XlinkRecessive.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Nominator withdrew their nomination. Furthermore, no arguments to delete were presented, other than the nomination itself. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality of the SVG image: File:XlinkRecessive.svg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep See #File:XlinkRecessive.svg below. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good Point. Thanks for noticing that. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn per Stefan2's comments. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XTubeLogoLARGE.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is very similar to File:XTubeLogoLARGE1.jpg Wikipedia does not need both. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yasser Harrak Srifi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is edited to where it has no encyclopedic value on Wikipedia. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yellowstone Vert Pan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a near duplicate of File:Yellowstone Vert Pan2revised.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Youssef.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is very similar to File:Youssef.jpg Wikipedia does not need both. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zodiacpan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:Zodiac pan~.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ZollerYaleNet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is similar to File:ZolNetYale.jpg but is a slightly lesser quality due to shutter speed. Do not need both images. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ZScreen-Main-Screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:ZScreen Main Screenshot.png -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ea-games.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable usage of non-free file (gallery). Artem Karimov (talk) 20:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3519770299 2fe54cdc1c z.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image has no true encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:695 in Maryland.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:695 in Maryland.png -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:8.28.07JephLoeb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is a slightly different duplicate of File:8.28.07JephLoebAtMidtownComicsNYC.jpg I don't believe we need both. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:9.3.07GrandLuxGardenStatePlaza.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is a slightly different duplicate of File:9.3.07GrandLuxGardenStatePlazabyLuigiNovi.JPG. There is no need for both. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abbey comparison.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is a flipped duplicate of File:Abbey comparison2.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AbhijeetSaha (2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is a lesser quality duplicate of File:Abhijeet.png -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adamasquicky.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is a near duplicate of File:Adamasquicky2.jpg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roselli and DeSimone.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Already on Commons > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_and_Frank.jpg Ted87 (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Friern Barnet library Oct 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friern Barnet library Sept 2011.jpg is identical and better licensed. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:National Assembly.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dupe of File:National Assembly Chambers.jpeg. One of them will have to go. Neither is used, so it probably doesn't matter which one. The other one could either be moved to Commons and deleted as F8 or be determined as not being in scope on Commons and thus deleted here. Stefan2 (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment both of them need to be renamed, Guyana isn't the only place with National Asssemblies. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 03:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CFL BCL Jersey 2004.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Identical to File:CFL BCL Jersey 2002.png. Note that the fair use rationale needs to be carried over to the other image. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, delete the 2004 one and keep the 2002 one. That was my mistake in the first place. Thanks, Cmm3 (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:La Cicala FilmPoster.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dupe of File:La cicala DVD cover.jpeg. Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XlinkRecessive.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually a PNG file with an SVG extension and it is a dupe of File:XlinkRecessive.png which has the correct extension. Stefan2 (talk) 23:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And if you look at the previous versions (some of them are SVG), you'll see that they just link to file:///C:/Users/Martin%20W/Documents/Downloads/XlinkRecessive.jpg and file:///C:/Users/Martin%20W/Documents/Downloads/XlinkRecessive.png which are supposed to be displayed by the SVG renderer. Since the URLs obviously only work on one computer and since they don't seem to point to SVG files in the first place, this seems to be a useless SVG file. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Thanks for noticing that. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.