Meodipt

---

first, the boiler-plate welcome:

Welcome!

Hello, Meodipt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

i'd also like to extend an invitation to the WikiProject on Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants. Which isn't invitation only or anything, i just thought that you might be interested in checking it out.

welcome again, hope you enjoy editing here!

Archives

User:Meodipt/2007 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2008 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2009 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2010 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2011 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2012 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2013 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2014 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2015 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2016 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2017 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2018 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2019 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2020 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2021 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2022 talk archive
User:Meodipt/2023 talk archive

Please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Kimen8 (talk) 12:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conversion of CBD to THC has been accepted

Conversion of CBD to THC, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 20:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

I would also like to mention, I have edited the article a bit to make it what I believe is mainspace-ready. I haven't changed too much, though I am not very experienced with articles on chemistry. I'm sure you know styling these much better than I do, so feel free to revert any changes I have made :)

On a side note, I found it ironic how I had been reading some papers on this topic just the other day, and here's a fresh AfC submission on the topic!

There is also a ScienceDirect article on this topic, which you can check out with the Wikipedia Library. OnlyNano^talk 20:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mephedrone

Mephedrone has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Spirochlorphine

Hi you seem to be very good at writing new articles on research chemicals.

My Spirochlorphine draft recently got rejected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dimefadane

Please could you help me to improve the article so that it gets accepted? Thank you.--Mo18ekula (talk) 11:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

It seems to have been accepted for publication now. However, it doesn't look like "Spirochlorphine" is an official name for the compound, so far as I can see this is just a name under which this molecule has been marketed for sale by research chemical vendors. Wikipedia policy is that the official page name should be the name by which the molecule is referred to in the cited sources; consequently, I will rename the page to R6890 until such time as there are reliable sources which refer to it as spirochlorphine. Meodipt (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Dimefadane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dimefadane

I would be greatful if you are able to help me on this draft to get it accepted.Mo18ekula (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Only useful reference I could find other than patents is this one "Schafer EW. The acute oral toxicity of 369 pesticidal, pharmaceutical and other chemicals to wild birds. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1972 Mar;21(3):315-30. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(72)90151-2. PMID: 5027965" but note it only mentions this compound in passing as one of many compounds tested. For a suitable RS to support an article you probably need to find an entry for this compound in some 1980s era textbook of obscure pharmaceutical agents, I have some books like this but don't have time to look it up right now. Will check if it is listed at some point. Meodipt (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)