Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/March-2024

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2025:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Siege of Baghdad

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Feb 2024 at 20:08:35 (UTC)

Original – 14th-century manuscript depiction of the 1258 Siege of Baghdad, a seminal event in world history.

Reason: Not only is this of exceptional quality for something created before 1400, but it also depicts a specific event during the siege—a leading official's failed attempt to escape by boat (center right), and was composed for the Jami' al-tawarikh, a very important work of literature. Thus, it holds great historical importance.
Articles in which this image appears: Siege of Baghdad; also e.g. Mongol Empire
FP category for this image: War
Creator: Unknown, uploaded by Yaan

Support as nominator – ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I also support the hi-res version. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In principle, this would be an excellent and amazing FP, but there's an extreme amount of JPEG artefacting. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TIF hi-res version, 141 MB

JPG hi-res version, 87 MB

@Adam Cuerden and AirshipJungleman29: Here's a Hi-Res TIFF version in case this helps. The source is here. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If'n we convert that, that's very featurable Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 22:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden and AirshipJungleman29: I added a Hi-Res JPEG version (87 MB), derived from the TIFF.पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 05:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support high-res JPEG Sorry I didn't just do it meself, it's been a day Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 07:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support high-res JPEG – Yann (talk) 17:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support high-res JPEG. MER-C 17:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support high-res JPEG Kymothoë (talk) 17:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support high-res. JPEG – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support high-res JPEG. – DreamRimmer (talk) 04:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support high-res JPEG TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Fall Of Baghdad (Diez Albums).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Galah

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2024 at 12:15:26 (UTC)

Original – Galah (Eolophus roseicapilla albiceps) male, Adelaide South Australia

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Galah
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Galahs are very common and relatively friendly birds, so we should be able to get a much better photo than this of them. 04:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Would you reject this one? These birds are common, but no Australian has managed to take a better shot than these two. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a nicer shot, but I'd suggest a tighter crop here. Nick-D (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I mean, I think it's good. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 08:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Galah (Eolophus roseicapilla albiceps) male Adelaide.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crescent-faced antpitta

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2024 at 12:08:39 (UTC)

Original – Crescent-faced antpitta (Grallaricula lineifrons), Caldas Department, Colombia

Reason: High quality image or rare bird about which little is know (hence the stub article). FP on Commons. This was Red List classified Near Threatened until 2019. It is hard to understand why the classification was changed.
Articles in which this image appears: Crescent-faced antpitta
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Charles, the criteria that led to the Red List classification change are set out in the 2019 report, including a relatively large range and an apparently stable population. Because the reported range has expanded significantly with more northerly records in Colombia, and because the species has turned out to be pretty easy to find and photograph in the right habitat once people started actively looking for it, I think the general consensus is that there are a lot more of them out there than one might have guessed from the fact that the first modern record was in 1971. Hence the progressive downgrading over the years from Vulnerable to Near Threatened to Least Concern (although I gather that not everyone agrees with the assessment). Cheers, Choliamb (talk) 18:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Crescent-faced antpitta (Grallaricula lineifrons) Caldas.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern grey kangaroo hopping

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2024 at 12:11:48 (UTC)

Original – Six sequential pictures of one Eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus), Australian Botanic Garden Mount Annan, New South Wales, Australia

Reason: High quality large image (composite of six photos of one kangaroo). Illustrates article well. FP on Commons. Page 46 of Sharp Eye on wildlife photography - Australia
Articles in which this image appears: Eastern grey kangaroo
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Some readers may interpret this composite as six kangaroos. Potentially misleading, IMO. – Sca (talk) 13:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - well, I thought it was a mob at first... but that problem is fixed with a simple addition to the caption: Successive photos of ... --Janke | Talk 20:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changes made as requested. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent image that clearly illustrates the most famous feature of these animals. Nick-D (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kymothoë (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Howard🌽33 21:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus) Mount Annan composite of 6.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Sheriff Curtis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2024 at 20:02:48 (UTC)

Original – Self portrait of photographer Edward Sheriff Curtis

Reason: while it does use the heavy chiaroscuro of the time, it's a lovely, characterful photo. And the chiaroscuro does give it a certain mood.
Articles in which this image appears: Edward S. Curtis
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Edward S. Curtis, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 20:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Curtis was important in the early documentation of Native American tribes. Good EV. And an interesting visage. (Cool hat!) – Sca (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 16:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 17:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 17:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Self portrait of Edward Sheriff Curtis.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Laocoön and His Sons

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2024 at 09:25:59 (UTC)

Original – Laocoön and His Sons

Reason: High resolution and quality
Articles in which this image appears: Laocoön and His Sons, others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture
Creator: Wilfredor

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for take the time to do this nomination Wilfredor (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A rather famous artwork photographed quite well. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 20:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 18:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Howard🌽33 21:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Laocoön and his sons group.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fires in Israel (October 7)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2024 at 21:47:05 (UTC)

Original – Fires in Israel from the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel.

Reason: Decent quality satellite photograph (5,699 × 3,206 pixels). Passes all eight parts of FP criteria and has high historical value for the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Image has also been used by multiple media outlets, showing the value of it. Example being this CNN article, which uses the image as the news article "cover" image.
Articles in which this image appears: List:

2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel (Infobox image)
Israel–Hamas war (One of the most viewed articles on Wikipedia)
Timeline of the Israel–Hamas war
Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/October 1 to 7, 2023 (Image for the Israel–Hamas war, 24th most viewed article).
Usage on 30+ additional Wikipedia articles and pages.

FP category for this image: History/War
Creator: Pierre Markuse (With Copernicus Programme satellite data)

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Is it possible to remove the caption and logo? – Howard🌽33 07:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aye, would say that's the minimal action before it could be considered for promotion. I'm also concerned that fire does not appear to be a major part of the incidents. There's some discussion of homes being set on fire, but not much, so it needs more clarity about what's set fires, what's incidental fire from rockets, etc. Were all the fires set by Hamas, or are some from Israeli forces? If the former, all's well, but... I mean, maybe it's great, but from a non-expert view... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 19:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wikipedia should avoid possible controversy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. (Agree with Charles – could be misconstrued as POV.) – Sca (talk) 14:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn — Clearly not ready for FP yet due to logo and caption on image. Noting I highly disagree with it having the potential to be “POV”, given the event related to this image ended over 3 months ago, so “POV” issues are merely opinions without policy backing. Nonetheless, not FP ready. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, main page play (presentation) might be misconstrued as POV. -- Sca (talk) 22:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see a bit more explanation of the image. If the caption is misleading, that could be POV, and the article, as I said, talks about fires in a few isolated cases, but not enough to really explain the image. It's not very well documented beyond "This is a satellite view from this day" and "You can see fires in it"; I think it reasonable to expect more, like linking at least most of the fires to incidents. Because this is worse than your average primary source as it stands: its only value is in the interpretation, so there's a risk of Original Research. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I processed this image and while I am grateful for the nomination and see no POV problems I support the decision to not make this a featured picture.

The description on the image is limited to what basically says "fires can be seen" on purpose because from a single satellite image, without further local context, it is almost impossible to determine the cause of a fire. Could have been a mortar shell, a rocket, lightning, electrical failure, or someone with a lighter setting a fire. While this picture certainly has some historical value, it should go along with a well researched news article in proper context. And though you could draw conclusions from the sudden appearance of so many fires at once, especially compared to the average day, this would still leave room for a lot of interpretation.

Additionally the image being a composite of natural colors and infrared, it should be noted that the "fires" that can be seen here are just areas of high IR emissions, which is a well-established technique to detect fires from space. However, this is not what the region would look like from space, as most, if not all of these fires were too small to be seen clearly (or at all) in natural colors from space. That is another thing that I believe would have to be communicated to the average viewer and makes using an image like this one even more cumbersome. PierreMarkuse (talk) 04:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elisabeth of Valois

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2024 at 01:51:57 (UTC)

Original – Elisabeth of Valois, Queen consort of Spain

Reason: High quality, good digitalization
Articles in which this image appears: Elisabeth of Valois etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
Creator: Author unknown

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It feels a little unsharp for 66 dpi. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strolling Actresses Dressing in a Barn

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2024 at 02:06:06 (UTC)

Original – Strolling Actresses Dressing in a Barn (1738)

Reason: High quality, high resolution, good digitalization
Articles in which this image appears: Strolling Actresses Dressing in a Barn
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Drawings
Creator: William Hogarth

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Minor enough damage that, while it might benefit, it doesn't need restoration. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chief Joseph

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2024 at 11:20:38 (UTC)

Original – Chief Joseph (Hin-mah-too-yah-lat-kekt) of the Nez Perce in 1903

Reason: A high-quality photogravure which I think has vastly improved his page.
Articles in which this image appears: Chief Joseph (and a few it was just addded to)
FP category for this image: Given the Nez Perce War, probably Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military? Could also argue for political or nobility.
Creator: Edward Sheriff Curtis, restored by Adam Cuerden. Yes, I'm on one of my deep dives.

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Detailed capture of Chief Joseph, probably showing his features better than some other period pics, such as this one (featured in Battle of the Clearwater). Now leads target bio infobox. A hero to Native Americans. – Sca (talk) 14:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aye. Think the 1874 pic has some justification for the events in 1874. The old lead image, though, was a photograph of a drawing - or at minimum, a photo so extremely retouched by Victorians to be indistinguishable from one^[1] - which is surely the worst possibility Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 18:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Book: Merril Beal: I Will Fight No More Forever: Chief Joseph and the Nez Perce War (1963). – Sca (talk) 15:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 09:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca, MER-C, Yann, and Charlesjsharp: Made a few additional fixes to the light spot in the upper left: It varies between copies of this, and the copy from the Smithsonian is on the most visible side. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I would side with Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political; Joseph led his people for decades before and after the war. blameless 03:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair point. Political, then. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Chief Joseph by Edward Sheriff Curtis.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Black-crowned Barwing

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2024 at 11:45:34 (UTC)

Original – A black-crowned barwing. Ngoc Linh Nature Reserve, Vietnam

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Black-crowned Barwing
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 21:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Black-crowned Barwing 0A2A7804.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Auricularia auricula-judae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2024 at 11:54:28 (UTC)

Original – Auricularia auricula-judae, Jelly Ear, taken in Enfield, UK.

Reason: Featured without opposition on Commons 1.5 years ago.
Articles in which this image appears: Auricularia auricula-judae
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Fungi
Creator: Stuart Phillips

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 13:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 03:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Jelly Ear, Auricularia auricula-judae, UK 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coal miner in Wheelwright, Kentucky

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2024 at 06:04:26 (UTC)

Original – Coal miner in Wheelwright, Kentucky, September 23, 1946

Reason: High resolution, good quality, high EV
Articles in which this image appears: Floyd County, Kentucky, History of coal miners, Wheelwright, Kentucky, Russell Lee
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Russell Lee, restored by FatCat96

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 06:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An interesting image but does not significant EV to any of the articles and should not be i Hillbilly Highway. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. -- Sca (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was already in the Hillbilly Highway article. I'll remove it. I'll have to disagree with you on the EV, as I do believe it illustrates both articles well, especially the History of coal miners article. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 15:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why isn't it in the photographer's article? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure. I'll add it to the articles image gallery if that's okay. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 15:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have the issue that this is a fantastic image, but is blown out of the water for EV in most articles it's in. I'm going to have to ~~Weak~~ Support, and that mainly for Wheelwright, Kentucky, but, even there, this is better. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 18:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Losing the "Weak" per Bammesk. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 14:21, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – This is a good lead image in the History of coal miners article. I prefer it as the infobox image over this, which can be FP on its own merit in the Inland Steel Company article and elsewhere. Bammesk (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Harry Fain, coal loader. Inland Steel Company, Wheelwright ^1 & 2 Mines, Wheelwright, Floyd County, Kentucky. - NARA - 541452 - cropped and restored.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Damage in the Gaza Strip (October 2023)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2024 at 15:49:20 (UTC)

Original – Damage following an Israeli airstrike on the El-Remal aera in Gaza City on October 9, 2023. (Commons caption)

Reason: Decent quality photograph which is a solid "a picture means a thousand words" for the Israel-Hamas war.
Articles in which this image appears: List:

War crimes in the Israel–Hamas war
Bombing of Gaza
Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/November 12 to 18, 2023
Usage on 50+ pages across various languages and projects

FP category for this image: History/War
Creator: Palestinian News & Information Agency – Unnamed correspondence with Wiki Palestine

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – A variable ongoing spot news event, and as such inappropriate as an FP candidate. – Sca (talk) 20:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This isn't FAC. We can use documentary photos here, as long as there's reasonable chance of them remaining. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As was often said in our past, "Wikipedia is not a news ticker." This scene could change any day and quite likely will due to the vagaries of war. And IMO, main page play might be misconstrued as POV. -- Sca (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Fulfills all criteria: well-composed and effective, clear encyclopedic value. Regarding the changing situation: it seems likely that articles on this topic will proliferate as more historically significant events happen, along the lines of what we have seen with Russian invasion of Ukraine, which now encompasses I don't know how many lengthy sub-articles. Therefore, it is reasonably likely that this image will continue to be used prominently in some articles. Regarding the main page: it will be several years before it gets there, at current rates, and we have had other powerful images of still-controversial wars on the main page before (this one, for example, or this). Our readers are capable of distinguishing between documentation and advocacy. blameless 02:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In all fairness, those wars have ended. Is there a precedent for giving FP status to ongoing conflicts? – Howard🌽33 21:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Iraq War had a bunch. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think Wikipedia should stay well out of possible controversy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, this image is used on over 50 pages across the Wikipedia and was the image noted in the Top 25 Report when the Israel–Hamas war was the 14th most viewed article during a week. If one image being promoted to FP is "controversy", why is it not controversy to have it on that many pages and a Top 25 report? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone, particularly those with a distinct PoV, can edit Wikipedia and there is no voting to monitor it; only a revert which itself courts controversy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Howard🌽33 21:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
comment There don't appear to be any people in the photo so not sure this is "Palestinians inspect the damage". area appears to be Rimal although it should be possible to geolocate more exactly.©Geni (talk) 05:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The caption is obviously wrong as no people are shown in the image, and it can't be promoted with this. Ping me when this is corrected. Nick-D (talk) 00:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nick-D: isn't the person behind the camera part of the inspection, though? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, not really. Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nick-D: Well, I've gone ahead and fixed it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Adam Nick-D (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now the caption is corrected, this image clearly illustrates what multiple RS have described as the level of destruction across much of Gaza so has strong EV. The photo is also well executed technically. Nick-D (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV. – Yann (talk) 23:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Damage in Gaza Strip during the October 2023 - 29.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Valley

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2024 at 05:41:31 (UTC)

Original – Stanley Valley and Mount Whymper viewed from the Stanley Glacier Trail.

Reason: Recently featured unanimously on Commons, used in the article infobox.
Articles in which this image appears: Kootenay National Park
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: The Cosmonaut

Support as nominator – The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Stanley Valley.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added it to Places/Panorama instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cité de Carcassonne

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2024 at 10:21:58 (UTC)

Original – Fortified city of Carcassonne during the blue hour, France. In 1997, it was added to the UNESCO list of World Heritage Sites because of its exceptional testimony to the architecture and planning of a medieval fortress town.

Reason: High quality and a FP candidate on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Cité de Carcassonne
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 10:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The same author's daytime image has more EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. These kinds of illuminated night scenes have plenty of uses (postcards, travel brochures), but the EV is relatively low compared to equally detailed photographs taken in good daylight (like the same author's photo in the infobox of the article). Two night images in the article is at least one too many. Choliamb (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I disagree that night photos are categorically lesser. If they are well done and well lit, they can be FPs. Bammesk (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dislike colors, blue is to strong and same with yellow on walls. --Petar Milošević (talk) 11:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Charles. That will have better EV that this night time shot. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raising a Flag over the Reichstag

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2024 at 12:41:22 (UTC)

Original – Raising a Flag over the Reichstag, taken during the Battle of Berlin on 2 May 1945.

Alt 1 Attempt to not blow the whites in the sky, lightly restored by Adam Cuerden

Reason: Iconic WWII photograph, high resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Raising a Flag over the Reichstag, Battle of Berlin, Bibliography of the Soviet Union during World War II, May 1945
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II
Creator: Yevgeny Khaldei

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 18:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I can't believe it was not already featured. MER-C 17:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Prefer alt. MER-C 16:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 03:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was sure its already FP. --Petar Milošević (talk) 11:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a heads up, I've distributed it to a few more articles. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 23:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC) @TheFreeWorld, MER-C, Vinícius94, Hamid Hassani, Charlesjsharp, FatCat96, and PetarM: I've done an alt, mainly because I think the sky was blown out in the original version - lots of textureless whites. I'd Support Alt, but I really apoloise if this is late and thus disruptive. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 23:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt I saw some too stong contrast and colors lost and highlithed on 1st edition. So this ALT is better. --Petar Milošević (talk) 11:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt – Agreed. Yann (talk) 13:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt – Vinícius O. (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 18:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Extremely familiar photo that smacks of propaganda. The gutted Reichstag bldg. had never been repaired after the famous Reichstag fire in 1933. 'Conquering' it in 1945 was a stunt for Soviet uses. – Sca (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca: I think you have a point, but given there's an article on the photo, I think that there's sufficient context. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 20:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Raising a flag over the Reichstag - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Inab

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2024 at 11:30:41 (UTC)

Original – The Battle of Inab from the 14th century Passages d'outremer.

Reason: For battles in the Crusades, there's going to be accuracy issues with any image, and this is not an exception, but this is, at least, from a work considered one of the materpieces of mediaeval manuscript illustration. Also, if an illustration is going to be inaccurate, I'd rather it be stylised like this, so it's patently clear it's inaccurate.
Articles in which this image appears: Battle of Inab + 8
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War
Creator: Jean Colombe

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 11:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interlink wasnt correct, solved now. At least check next time.--Petar Milošević (talk) 11:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. It's kind of awkward that it's the only type of bad link that shows blue. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 14:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:BattleOfInab.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meeting of the Molly M'Guire Men

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2024 at 19:05:23 (UTC)

Original – The Strike in the Coal Mines—Meeting of Molly M'Guire Men

Reason: Nice illustration to a deep topic. Article's well worth reading. Would have preferred a higher resolution scan, but think the detail's all there, given the size of the woodblock carvings.
Articles in which this image appears: Molly McGuires
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Paul Frenzeny and Jules Tavernier, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 19:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 20:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Adam Cuerden: Is the source link to Georgia State University on the Commons file page correct? When I try it I get blocked with a notice that a login is required for access to "restricted or unpublished collections". Choliamb (talk) 14:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Choliamb: I thought it was, but I've updated it to the exact link I used. Could've sworn I clicked through with the old link, but guess not. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Support. Choliamb (talk) 21:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Strike in the Coal Mines - Meeting of Molly M'Guire Men.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Barren geese

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2024 at 11:34:51 (UTC)

Original – Cape Barren geese (Cereopsis novaehollandiae) in flight over Kangaroo Island, South Australia

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Cape Barren goose
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 21:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cape Barren geese (Cereopsis novaehollandiae) in flight Kangaroo Island 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow bee-eater

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2024 at 11:31:21 (UTC)

Original – Rainbow bee-eater (Merops ornatus), Fogg Dam, Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Rainbow bee-eater
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Sharper than the infobox image by Harrison (which is a lovely photo, and was FP in 2011, but camera technology marches on ...) Choliamb (talk) 14:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, John Harrison has not uploaded new images of common birds; he is too busy getting new rare ones and is relaxed about his old ones being superseded... Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 11:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 14:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rainbow bee-eater (Merops ornatus) Fogg Dam.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plumed whistling duck

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2024 at 11:28:31 (UTC)

Original – Plumed whistling duck (Dendrocygna eytoni), Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. There is an existing FP on English Wikipedia. Nicer background, but the feet are obscured.
Articles in which this image appears: Plumed whistling duck
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 14:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Plumed whistling duck (Dendrocygna eytoni) Kakadu.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aachen Cathedral

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2024 at 20:13:43 (UTC)

Original – Aachen Cathedral is a Catholic church in Aachen, Germany and the seat of the Diocese of Aachen.

Reason: High quality and good composition.
Articles in which this image appears: Aachen Cathedral, others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Cccefalon

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 20:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Subject is hidden and I doubt the EV. Need another angle, preferably with less hindrances. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Conspiracy of Claudius Civilis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2024 at 19:57:24 (UTC)

Original – The Conspiracy of Claudius Civilis (c. 1661–62), by Rembrandt

Reason: High quality
Articles in which this image appears: The Conspiracy of Claudius Civilis, Batavi (Germanic tribe), Batavi (military unit), List of drawings by Rembrandt, List of revolutions and rebellions, Military history of the Netherlands, Netherlands in the Roman era, Revolt of the Batavi
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Rembrandt

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 03:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've taken the liberty of renaming the file to something that's a little more meaningful. If three "e"s in a row is, in fact, correct, I apologise. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 23:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Conspiracy of Claudius Civilis by Rembrandt van Rijn.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Cheat

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2024 at 11:20:25 (UTC)

Original – Film poster for The Cheat, a 1923 lost film.

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last year, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: The Cheat (1923 film)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Paramount Pictures (restored by Ezarate)

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This could probably be cropped a bit more evenly, and you could use the dodge tool to fix the edges a bit because of the shading in the corners, but that last is something I only got half-decent at last year, and don't know if anyone else notices. It's a quality restoration. Support, but would suggest a trim to make left and right edges equal width. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 16:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but strongly agree with Adam about recropping to make the margins even. The unbalanced borders are distracting and give the image as a whole a slightly careless appearance, which is a shame when the quality is otherwise so good. Choliamb (talk) 22:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Choliamb: After asking Ezarate's permission, I've done so. You may need to purge the page. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 20:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. Thanks, Choliamb (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MER-C, Charlesjsharp, Moonreach, and Hamid Hassani: Suppose I should ping all of you, though it's pretty minor. Crop and a couple minor fixes because I cannae help m'sel. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Cheat LCCN2010649713-restored.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lophocampa caryae caterpillar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2024 at 11:26:43 (UTC)

Original – Top view of a hickory tiger moth larva

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons four years ago.
Articles in which this image appears: Lophocampa caryae
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: The Cosmonaut

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support; thank you for the nomination. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 22:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lophocampa caryae caterpillar.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Himba herders

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2024 at 06:13:26 (UTC)

Original – A male and female pair of Himba herders in Namibia's Northwestern Kunene region. The woman wears otjize that colors her skin red.

Reason: High-quality (3,000 x 2,000), beautifully composed, amazing colors (showing the otjize worn by the woman). Shows a member of each sex, with faces visible. As an illustration of Himba dress, appearance, and lifestyle (these two are herders), it adds great encyclopedic value.
Articles in which this image appears: Himba people
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Traditional dress
Creator: Hans Stieglitz

Support as nominator – Zanahary (talk) 06:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor technical quality, over-saturated colours. Surprised that the printed butterflies are claimed to be traditional dress. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – At full size the details aren't sharp, especially the woman (who is out of focus). Otherwise I would have supported. Good EV and excellent composition though. Bammesk (talk) 01:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Black kite in flight

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2024 at 11:59:37 (UTC)

Original – Black kite (Milvus migrans affinis) in flight over Adelaide River, Northern Territory, Australia

Reason: High quality image. Not in infobox as it is a flight image, but high EV. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Black kite
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm tempted to add this photo to the article Kite as well, as an illustration of the final sentence in the first paragraph. It's a particularly kite-like kite! Choliamb (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. That's a beauty. BD2412 T 02:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Black kite (Milvus migrans affinis) in flight Adelaide River 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand fur seal female with suckling pup

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2024 at 11:52:37 (UTC)

Original – New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) female with suckling pup on Kangaroo Island, South Australia Australia

Reason: High quality large image. Illustrates article well with high EV. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: New Zealand fur seal
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Howard🌽33 22:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 13:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) female with suckling pup Kangaroo Island.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow lorikeet

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2024 at 11:48:12 (UTC)

Original – Rainbow lorikeet (Trichoglossus moluccanus) Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Easy CSS image crop to show a possiible improvement?

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Rainbow lorikeet
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ – Lovely image. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 03:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I do believe it’s a lovely image, and I do like the flowers, I have to agree with Nick on this. As Nick stated, an FP of a lorikeet should depict the animals behaviors in an eye-catching way, this photo does not, therefore reluctant oppose. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 06:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Depicting animals behaviours? Have you looked at FPs of Australian birds? What sort of behaviour are you looking for. THis comment makes zero sense. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My comment makes perfect sense. Lorikeets are very playful, comical, photogenic, and friendly birds, and I think an FP of a lorikeet should depict that. I also don't like how the flowers obscure the feet of the bird. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 06:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FatCat96 Please strike out the duplicate !vote for clarity. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unremarkable photo of an extremely common Australian bird with no fear at all of humans. A FP of a Rainbow lorikeet should be much more eye-catching than this and/or better depict their behaviours. Note that there are a vast number of photos of these very photogenic and friendly birds at Commons. Nick-D (talk) 09:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell us which of the hundreds of images of this bird that you think are better than this image. I couldn't find one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're hoping to achieve with responses like this. Nick-D (talk) 10:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm hoping to achieve? I'm trying to get you to justify your oppose vote. This request has been ignored. If you cannot justify your vote, or refuse to - in this case by indicating which of the many competing images you prefer - then you vote could be considered disruptive. So please respond. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP voters don't need to nominate better images when they post an oppose vote. This image does not meet the FP standards as it is not a good photo of these incredibly common and easy to photograph birds (wild lorrikeets will happily sit on your hand if you offer them food, for instance). Nick-D (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. (Per FPC guidelines) Sorry, but it's not a good photo is such a carpet term, providing no rationale whatsoever, far from specificity. Charles is a veteran FP nominator/creator and I'm pretty sure they won't pick a random picture for nomination. Plus your rationale sounds very close to IDONTLIKEIT. Not something I would expect from a sysop or someone with experience. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my oppose vote, where I explain just that. I'm also not sure what you're hoping to achieve by hectoring? Nick-D (talk) 04:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ – I don't understand the oppose!votes. They sound like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. The image is really good and it doesn't matter if there are a million photos of Parakeets on Commons. EV is specific for this image and it is clearly fulfilled here. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nick-D is an admin so he must he know how to behave here. Let's wait for his explanation. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Struck this vote to avoid double counting. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support either The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ Sharp (!) image with eye-catching colors. – Sca (talk) 15:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Struck this vote to avoid double counting. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kind of neutral on this one: Well photographed, but having part of his body behind the plant is kind of awkward. It's kind of cute, though, and maybe even interestingly composed. Or maybe awkwardly? I keep changing my mind. Very right-balanced, anyway. Perhaps if you cropped a little on the left? It does make it feel more balanced (see example) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 22:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The very cautiously cropped version looks good, too. Support either one. – Sca (talk) 15:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rainbow lorikeet (Trichoglossus moluccanus moluccanus) Sydney.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only the original has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ma, Ma, where's my Pa?

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2024 at 03:44:58 (UTC)

Original – An anti-Grover Cleveland cartoon highlighting the Halpin scandal

Alt 1 – uncropped and restored

Alt 2 - I'd consider this about where this wants to be, but I'm not sure it's good enough. Uploaded a PNG if anyone wants to try and fix. -Adam

Reason: High resolution and good quality
Articles in which this image appears: Grover Cleveland, Grover Cleveland 1884 presidential campaign, 1884 United States presidential election
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Frank Beard

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 03:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting but limited EV in the articles. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Didn't know it was cropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Lacks gravitas. EV doubtful. – Sca (talk) 13:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Crops out the caption (where the joke is), and edges. No real need to not show the full page, for that matter. Also, kind of bluish. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 and Alt 2 – for use in (EV) Grover Cleveland 1884 presidential campaign. Bammesk (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Alt is absolutely loaded with JPEG artefacts, though. Should probably grab one from the LoC TIFF. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. I missed that. The LOC original is much better. It needs a bit of touching up. I can get it in the next day or two, if you Adam or FatCat96 don't do it first. ~~I changed my vote to Conditional support for now.~~ Bammesk (talk) 01:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded and changed the Alt version. It is now a restoration from the original LoC TIFF. Pinging participants @FatCat96, Adam Cuerden, Moonreach, and Vinícius94:. Bammesk (talk) 02:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, I fear: Colours are clearly highly changed by paper yellowing. I've done some experiments, and - while it would need a ton of edge cleanup due to vignetting at the edges, a simple bracketing of R G and B individually, setting white and black to maximum and minimum with content, gives highly believable colours Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 04:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and nice restoration. I've been so busy lately, I haven't had much time to restore anything. Also, GIMP has suddenly stopped working for me, and I'm trying to figure out how to fix it. I hope to get back to restoring more images once everything is resolved. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 16:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adam, that's a support from me for Alt 2, as well as any other version you might upload. Let me know if a PNG version of 'Alt 1' can be of any use to you and I will upload it. Thanks for your input and your work. Bammesk (talk) 01:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I can Support Alt 2. Probably too late for the upload of the PNG, though: I'd have to restart work. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support alt Moonreach (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support both – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1 and alt 2 – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 & Alt 2 – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 2 – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Another voice for Cleveland - F.B. LCCN95522869 - restoration2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Max Reinhardt

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2024 at 00:37:13 (UTC)

Original – Reinhardt in 1911

Reason: 1911 high-resolution photo. Good quality
Articles in which this image appears: Max Reinhardt etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Nicola Perscheid

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source is patently wrong. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 22:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Otto von Habsburg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2024 at 00:47:43 (UTC)

Original – Otto von Habsburg in 2006

Reason: High quality and good resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Otto von Habsburg etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility
Creator: Oliver Mark

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Great EV. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – for the EV. But very strange composition! and black and white in 2006! Bammesk (talk) 01:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – The former Habsburg crown prince seems a rather obscure political figure of scant EV to present-day readers, given his quixotic post-WWI pronouncements. – Sca (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca: This year, I've had a featured pictures of an opera that hasn't been performed in decades, a ship that sunk on its first journey in 1883, and an impressionistic photograph I doubt anyone who voted on it had seen before, and a forgotten atrocity. If we start talking about modern interest in things, that kills a lot of history off. As such, Support, I think. But agree with Bammesk that this is weird. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 22:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the face is actually interesting -- but it's such a small part of the photo. -- Sca (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair point. I kind of wonder if this wasn't intentionally based on some photo from his youth. This feels very 1920s/30s. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Oliver Mark - Otto Habsburg-Lothringen, Pöcking 2006.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because flowers and chocolates weren't grand enough

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2024 at 18:33:13 (UTC)

Original – The Taj Mahal, an ivory-white marble mausoleum in Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. It was commissioned in 1631 by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan to house the tomb of his beloved wife, Mumtaz Mahal.

Reason: Excellent EV, lead image with perfect lighting and subject visibility, along with great resolution and quality.
Articles in which this image appears: Taj Mahal
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Yann; edited by King of Hearts; derivative work by Jbarta

Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw since File:Taj Mahal (Edited).jpeg is already an FP. Should trout myself for forgetting that FPC nom. It's been 10 years, so I guess I can be excused, lol. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: excellent nomination title. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 22:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A very good choice; but, this file is a FP of the place which was promoted in October 2012. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Baez

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2024 at 13:15:12 (UTC)

Original – Joan Baez in 1973

Reason: high quality picture used as lead, image shows her when she was at the peak of her carrier
Articles in which this image appears: Joan Baez
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Bernard Gotfryd, restored and uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Subject has been photographed thousands of times over the last six decades. – Sca (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a good thumbnail but at full size (even at 50%), it's too soft. She is well photographed, so a better (sharper) photo can be expected. Sorry, but reluctant Oppose. Bammesk (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the truly iconic photograph of Baez is this one. Our copy is poorly edited, but it would be worthwhile to start over from the tiff file, which can be found here. blameless 02:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blanche Roosevelt

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2024 at 04:10:27 (UTC)

Original – Blanche Roosevelt, operatic soprano, who created the role of Mabel in The Pirates of Penzance^[2]

Alt Also a good image, by Napoleon Sarony

Reason: A fine photograph of a notable actress. I think I've said before that I decide whether to crop the cabinet card mount based on the amount of detail (they can range from blank to elaborate signatures and captions), the state of the card mount, and, sometimes, whether we want the card mount for the photographer's article. The mount was pretty mangled in this copy; cut to a weird shape with scissors or something. I didn't think I could accurately fix Mora's mangled signature, so I cropped to the photo. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 04:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Articles in which this image appears: Blanche Roosevelt
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: José Maria Mora, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support both as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 04:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ – Detail average for late 19th C., but interesting bio article on a woman who was an opera singer, author and journalist. – Sca (talk) 15:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Now support either image. See below.~~ -- Sca (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Struck this vote to avoid double counting. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aye. Also, much better than anything we had before, which is a point in its favour, albeit not enough on its own to promote an image. dp.la has a Napoleon Sarony portrait which has its charms as well; might try to bring that one over so we at least have her at a second angle. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I did, and, since it was in good condition, restored it as well: File:Blanche Roosevelt by Napoleon Sarony.jpg. Can really see the focal plane in that one, but at least it's well-positioned. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That one's very nice, too, because of the angle of the comp. -- Sca (talk) 19:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. If we were a little more willing to promote two similar images... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 20:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I sorta prefer the other pose, but I guess the first one has more detail. -- Sca (talk) 22:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support either – Bammesk (talk) 03:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer original, initially I preferred the Alt, but the more I look at the original, the more I like it. Bammesk (talk) 15:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 03:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support either one~~, per discussion above. – Sca (talk) 13:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support both Moonreach (talk) 16:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. MER-C 17:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support original. (The hair does it for me.) But I do not oppose the alt. Choliamb (talk) 01:27, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Adam Cuerden: Currently both images have 8 supports and it is impossible to determine which image should be promoted without additional input from the participants of the discussion. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Armbrust:, would it help if I simply cancelled my support for the orig? Or is it too late for something like that? -- Sca (talk) 13:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Armbrust: That's what I feared. I presume promoting both isn't an option? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extend the nom, prolly. Or ping the participants for consensus. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for the record, I slightly prefer the first, especially as - presuming both are going to be in the article - the alt should probably be the second due to the "face text when possible" rule, and, honestly, the fadeout of her below the shoulders in the second, while common in the time period, seems to go a little too far, like the fade out was meant for an oval mount, but wasn't mounted in one, so it ends a little too abruptly - maybe that's just me. They're both good images, mind, and we could call them a set, but I didn't nominate it as such. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 03:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Armbrust and Adam Cuerden: I see 7 supports for the Alt, not 8. Charles, Choliamb, and VulcanSphere clearly did not support the Alt. VulcanSphere clearly could have supported the Alt, as did 6 editors prior, but they did not. We shouldn't second guess their vote. On a different note, my vote above now indicates a preference. Bammesk (talk) 15:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, let's do this properly. @Charlesjsharp, Sca, Moonreach, MER-C, and VulcanSphere: Would you please state your preferences? I've only pinged those who haven't voted unambiguously for one option; add pings if I missed anyone. (I left out Bammesk because he commented already). Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I really do support both, but if rules force this to be an either/or situation then I pick the alt, and I'll leave a new vote to affirm that at the bottom. Moonreach (talk) 19:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bammesk My opinion regarding this is, that if someone says "support" at a time an alternative wasn't added yet, that only applies to the original, but if it's added after the alt is already present, than it applies for both. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Armbrust: Ok, that's your opinion. You are saying that your definition of support changes during the 10-day course of a nomination. I think that's a bad idea. It's not in the WP:FPC instructions or FP criteria, and I am not aware of any discussion or consensus that allows for changing the definition of 'support' midway a nomination. The onus is on the voters to express themselves. When a voter doesn't express themselves in regard to an Alternate image, we shouldn't assume that they have expressed themselves, by "changing the definition of support" midway a nomination. Regards. Bammesk (talk) 03:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt – unambiguously. – Sca (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt if this has to be an either/or situation. If we're allowed to try to promote both pictures at once, I'd still like to do that. Moonreach (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a tie or stalemate, perhaps we could ask @Armbrust: to cast the deciding vote. He's certainly got the the requsite experience. -- Sca (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Blanche Roosevelt by Napoleon Sarony.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original has 6 supports and the alt has 8. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for working through this situation with us, Armbrust. -- Sca (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, thank you. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 03:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ornge AgustaWestland AW139

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2024 at 17:57:33 (UTC)

Original – Ornge AgustaWestland AW139 departing from the Grand River Hospital helipad, Ontario, Canada.

Reason: Featured without opposition on Commons two months ago.
Articles in which this image appears: Ornge, AgustaWestland AW139
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air
Creator: The Cosmonaut

Support as nominator – MER-C 17:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support; thank you for the nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – A red helicopter. Meh. EV? – Sca (talk) 15:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ornge C-GYNP.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Mayfield tornado damage

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2024 at 18:20:23 (UTC)

Original – Aerial view of EF4 damage in Mayfield the day after the 2021 Western Kentucky tornado

Reason: The high-quality image (5,464 × 3,640 pixels) passed a Commons Featured Picture vote 13 to 1. It also has high encyclopedic value in relation to one of the most famous tornadoes in the last decade. A reverse image search shows the image is used by various media outlets and even Penn State University. One media outlet used the image two years after the tornado ([1]), proving the high-encyclopedic value of it.
Articles in which this image appears: List:

FP category for this image: History/USA History
Creator: State Farm Insurance

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to support this, but I'm pretty sure the tornado didn't cause the perspective distortion. MER-C 11:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Ephemeral news-type photo; scant EV. – Sca (talk) 15:11, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being used two years later by a RS I think means it is not ephemeral. I respect your opinion and !vote, but I think it lacks any backing. The image is used on four pages, including the town’s article which was leveled by the tornado & the article featured on Wikipedia’s ITN. You aren’t required to reply at all, but I would love to hear some additional backing for why you consider a photograph with 2-year usage from an event to be a short-lived news photograph and why usage on the four articles does not give it much EV? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 19:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sca, I think you should've done some research before posting your oppose vote. This was a major, once in a lifetime event with long lasting effects. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 20:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Urban weather damage, at least in developed countries, is nearly always ephemeral. Are you saying that this section of Mayfield still looks like this? (BTW, this user is a former Ky. resident.) -- Sca (talk) 14:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So your argument is based on whether the town still looks like it instead of something like whether it has a lasting historical impact? This ain’t notability for an article, but it seems weird that your reasoning is ignoring lasting historical usage and going with more or less “eh, developed nation had damage, just a media cycle” style of reasoning. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 14:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite clear, no doubt, somehow. -- Sca (talk) 16:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong support – Major event with a long lasting effect, definitely not ephemeral. Very high EV in all the articles. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 20:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – I think it's too visually noisy to read well at the size featured pictures are displayed. Granted, this is a photograph of something that's inherently messy, but the destruction is so complete that I can't really reconstruct the tornado's path. The only intact structures are far away in the background. Moonreach (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 20:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mayfield KY State Farm CRU -23.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Abduction of Europa

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2024 at 19:27:47 (UTC)

Original – The Abduction of Europa (1632), by Rembrandt, now held at the J. Paul Getty Museum, California.

Reason: Very high quality.
Articles in which this image appears: The Abduction of Europa (Rembrandt), others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Rembrandt

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 20:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn - The Abduction of Europa - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Germanicus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2024 at 19:53:22 (UTC)

Original – Bust of young Germanicus at the time of his adoption by Tiberius in AD 4. Now the bust is held at the J. Paul Getty Museum

Reason: Very high resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Germanicus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military
Creator: J. Paul Getty Museum

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Historical background: Despite the name, he wasn't of German or Germanic origin. – Sca (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DEGA MD (talk) 00:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, fine details, authentic Roman sculpture. Brandmeister^talk 17:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Bust of Germanicus, front - Getty Museum (2021.66).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stamp of Ukraine (Russian Warship)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2024 at 14:44:51 (UTC)

Original – Postage stamp of Russian warship, go fuck yourself

Reason: Extremely famous Ukrainian stamp which is even inducted into the British National Maritime Museum. A google reverse search shows over 700 usages of this single image/stamp. Article is also used on a lot of EN Wiki articles. The Spectator published an article almost entirely related to the stamp even.
Articles in which this image appears: List:

Russian warship, go fuck yourself
Snake Island campaign
Russian invasion of Ukraine
Sinking of the Moskva
Russian cruiser Moskva
Snake Island (Ukraine)
Naval warfare in the Russian invasion of Ukraine
Mint condition
Usage on about 100 other Wikipedia pages/articles

FP category for this image: History/War
Creator: Борис Грох (English: Boris Groh)

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 14:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Historic and funny, but regretfully below par resolution for FP. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per FP criteria, exceptions can be made to the rule of size for historic and unique images. No one can deny this has high EV, and a look at the image’s history on the commons indicates it was above the size criteria until July 2022, when it was replaced with this one which has one dimension pass the criteria. Just wanted to point that out. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be true for a stamp from, let's say, 1940s. This is a stamp from yesteryear, where a high quality scan is quite possible. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Featured_pictures#Currency for some specimen of what we are looking for in a FP. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Poor specimen of the stamp. Poor scan. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Way too POV for a TFP. – Sca (talk) 19:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Request withdrawn The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 19:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Willa Beatrice Brown

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2024 at 00:25:40 (UTC)

Original – Willa Brown as a lieutenant in the United States Civil Air Patrol

Reason: High quality image used as lead. Strong EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Willa Beatrice Brown
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others
Creator: Unknown photographer, restored by FatCat96

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 00:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – there is a white vertical streak under the base of the bottle, it can be removed. A similar one in the original (bottom right corner) was removed. On a sidenote, when restoring, it's best to start from the original tiff, rather than a jpeg. Bammesk (talk) 02:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While one has to be careful people don't stop looking African-American, this does feel like it's rather low contrast, nothing lighter than a dull grey. Maybe play with the white and midpoints of the levels a little? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I've fixed your concern. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 01:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not mine, I fear. But trying some things, it honestly looks like setting the white point pretty near the brightest point in the image will largely fix this. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, has some pencil drawing-like soft and flat look (particularly as compared to some other photos of that period). Brandmeister^talk 17:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I like old shots, but still isnt as it could be, unsharp, like fuzzed. --Petar Milošević (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – A good nomination, but the haziness and the unsharp details is commendable. Yes, it resonates with the time period and the style of the photo, but we have had older and sharper FPs. Also, per Adam's comment on contrast and white balance. Another point, negligible yet important IMO, is the angle of the subject. It kinda reduces the EV for a lead image of a GA.The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen Axson Wilson

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2024 at 01:57:40 (UTC)

Original – Ellen Wilson in 1910

Reason: High quality image used as lead. High resolution, high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Ellen Axson Wilson
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others
Creator: Davis and Son, Restored by FatCat96

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 01:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 13:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ellen Axson Wilson (4435974396) - cropped and retouched.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to People/Political instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Willa Beatrice Player

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2024 at 04:55:34 (UTC)

Original – Willa Beatrice Player, an American educator, college administrator, college president, civil rights activist, and federal appointee, at the start of her career in 1930.

Reason: It's a little undersized, but I think it has pretty much all the actual detail, and it's about like, 585dpi or so, which really isn't bad. A bit zoomed in, but that does help justify the size: Her face probably occupies more pixels than a lot of images we've promoted that technically have much larger dimensions. Undeniably the best available photo of her.
Articles in which this image appears: Willa Beatrice Player
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political if we're classifying her as a civil rights activist - which she was, but she did so as an educator, which might make it better to classify her as an educator, hence Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others.
Creator: Unknown photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 04:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Xcllnt capture of an expressive face. High EV for her multiple career activities. – Sca (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. What a beautiful photograph. And yes, educator is a much better classification, since that's clearly what she considered herself to be and how she would have wanted to be remembered. It's a shame that educators are lumped into the miscellaneous "Others" category along with carpenters, haberdashers, and cod fishermen, rather than having a category of their own. Maybe there should be a general "Academic" category for teachers, scholars, educational reformers, etc.? Choliamb (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aye. I think we split "Others" whenever we have enough. Think we do? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 20:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not. I suppose I should put my money where my mouth is and search for more academic images to nominate. But to do that I'd have to overcome my profound laziness, which doesn't seem likely to happen. Choliamb (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some of them might be elsewhere, of course, as there is a tendency to classify someone anywhere that's better than "Others" Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 02:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here are a few educators currently outside "others": in "artists and writers," Adrianne Wadewitz; in "politics," Mary Church Terrell, Angela Davis, and Booker T. Washington. Plus, yes, there are a few in "others" also. blameless 16:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca, The Herald, and Choliamb: Made a couple more fixes: There were a couple scratches I hesitated with, but, after reviewing other photos, they're clearly damage. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 07:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better to me. Vote remains unchanged :) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reaffirm support. Choliamb (talk) 11:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I too. -- Sca (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Too bad we don't have a picture this good from the height of her career (oy), but thems the breaks. blameless 16:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aye. Luckily, we can always add photos if they come up. Don't think this is going to leave the article, just might move to second photo if we get a good one from a later period. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And luckily, it's an utterly charming photo (despite DOF issue at lower right). -- Sca (talk) 16:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think they got a bit better at having a wider depth of field in the time after File:Blanche Roosevelt by Napoleon Sarony.jpg, but I don't think it was much larger, since the aperture likely still needed to be fairly large to have enough light get in within a reasonable timeframe. The chemistry improved by 1930, but this was primarily used to reduce the time of exposure. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca:. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wonder what sort of camera was used in 1930. Graflex? Leica?-- Sca (talk) 12:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Willa Beatrice Player - From the archives of The Crisis.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Barren goose

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2024 at 21:43:16 (UTC)

Original – Cape Barren goose (Cereopsis novaehollandiae), Kangaroo Island, South Australia

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. We have an existing FP from over ten years ago. I think this image should replace it in the Infobox.
Articles in which this image appears: Cape Barren goose
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The trees are lil bit distracting in the background, but not a limiting factor. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support to replace existing FP File:Cereopsis novaehollandiae 2.jpg. MER-C 17:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cape Barren goose (Cereopsis novaehollandiae) Kangaroo Island.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific gull

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2024 at 21:38:19 (UTC)

Original – Pacific gull (Larus pacificus), Freycinet Peninsula, Tasmania, Australia

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Pacific gull
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Uff...that pious expression. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Should replace existing FP File:Larus pacificus Bruny Island.jpg. MER-C 15:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pacific gull (Larus pacificus pacificus) Freycinet.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slaty brushfinch

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2024 at 21:33:34 (UTC)

Original – Slaty brushfinch (Atlapetes schistaceus), Caldas Department, Colombia

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Slaty brushfinch
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 01:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Love the way the rule of thirds is covered here. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 15:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Slaty brushfinch (Atlapetes schistaceus schistaceus) Caldas.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Gardner

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2024 at 08:01:09 (UTC)

Original – Photographer Alexander Gardner

Reason: Another of my "photos of photographers", this was one of the major photographers of the American Civil War, and I think the photo - although the cardstock grain certainly could have been better - is a very good one. Cropped to the photo itself since there was nothing significant whatsoever about the mount (a plain bit of very dirty card with a badly centred double-line border (which doesn't quite fit the card, leading to it becoming single-lined for much of the sides), and no text or decoration). I've said my way of evaluating whether to crop the mount before, but I think it's amply clear why this one loses.
Articles in which this image appears: Alexander Gardner (photographer), Photographers of the American Civil War
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: James Gardner, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 08:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:51 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Alexander Gardner by James Gardner - 1863.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enrico Fermi

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2024 at 17:42:27 (UTC)

Original – Enrico Fermi in 1943.

Reason: Good capture.
Articles in which this image appears: Enrico Fermi, others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: United States Department of Energy, restored by Yann

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Need some restoration, but it's a good quality 1940s photograph, thus support! – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, needs restoration. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Support – Historical EV. Fermi's work was cited in Einstein's pivotal letter to FDR regarding prospects for an atomic (fission) bomb. – Sca (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional~~ support, ~~if it's restored.~~ (now it's restored, so support). Bammesk (talk) 03:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Restoration done. @TheFreeWorld, Vinícius94, Charlesjsharp, Sca, and Bammesk: FYI. Yann (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Also Yann should be credited for the restoration (TheFreeWorld you may add it in the nomination, in the creator listing). The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Enrico Fermi 1943-49.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soprano saxophone

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2024 at 18:15:42 (UTC)

Original – Yamaha soprano saxophone, model YSS-875 EX

Reason: High quality
Articles in which this image appears: Soprano saxophone
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Yamaha Corporation

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not a fan of artificial backgrounds - there are a few small errors where the cut-out has been missed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Charles. Looks sort of artificial. – Sca (talk) 13:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 01:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – This type of background makes sense for certain subjects [2] [3]. I see no missed cut-outs. Taking an exception to the 1500px criterion because of the unusual tall aspect ratio. Bammesk (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a note showing where the missed cutouts are Bammesk. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see it now. They are too small to change my vote. But if there is a consensus to remove them, I be happy to do it. Bammesk (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – For me, this is a near-perfect example of the kind of professionally made photos of everyday objects we need on the Wikimedia projects, and of which we have so few. --Gnom (talk) 22:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Gnom. – Yann (talk) 12:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Yamaha Saxophone YSS-875 EX.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Garibaldi Lake

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2024 at 23:37:51 (UTC)

Original – Garibaldi Lake and Sphinx Glacier seen from Panorama Ridge.

Reason: Recently featured unanimously on Commons, used in the articles' infoboxes.
Articles in which this image appears: Garibaldi Lake, Garibaldi Provincial Park
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: The Cosmonaut

Support as nominator – The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – The lake is barely featured on 40% of the image. Doubt the EV. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

100% of the image is within the provincial park though. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sharpness is subpar at full size. It's EXIF says it was shot with a cell phone. Bammesk (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forte Príncipe da Beira

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2024 at 11:15:09 (UTC)

Original – Drone view of the Forte Príncipe da Beira, Brazil.

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons in 2022.
Articles in which this image appears: Forte Príncipe da Beira
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Israelvalejr

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree about the excessive perspective distortion. Don't understand the Criterion 3 comment. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp I think he means that it's not among Wikipedia's best work. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. -- Sca (talk) 13:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – Perspective distortion, indistinct background. (See Criterion No. 3.) – Sca (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Unanimously featured in Commons is not exactly a reason for FPC in enwiki. Also, the very evident distortion and unsharp details towards the ends. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Silver-breasted broadbill

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2024 at 11:20:27 (UTC)

Original – A male silver-breasted Broadbill (Serilophus lunatus). Deo Nui San, South-Vietnam

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Silver-breasted broadbill
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not the finest technical quality but rarity outweighs this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good picture of an adorable bird! Moonreach (talk) 19:32, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, nice wing colors. Brandmeister^talk 19:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Silver-breasted Broadbill 0A2A9641.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Common wombat juvenile

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2024 at 15:30:11 (UTC)

Original – Common wombat (Vombatus ursinus tasmaniensis) juvenile on Maria Island, Tasmania, Australia

Reason: High quality large image. Illustrates article well with high EV. FP on Commons. Not in infobox as it is a juvenile
Articles in which this image appears: Common wombat
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to him being a cute little fella. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 22:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Female galah in flight

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2024 at 15:59:40 (UTC)

Original – Galah (Eolophus roseicapilla), female in flight in Mount Pleasant, South Australia

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. We have an existing FP of a male on the ground
Articles in which this image appears: Galah
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

African buffalo with oxpecker (2)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2024 at 15:48:40 (UTC)

Original – African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) male with Red-billed oxpecker, (Buphagus erythrorhynchus), Phinda Private Game Reserve, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Reason: High quality large image. Illustrates both bird and mammal articles well with high EV. FP on Commons. Previous nomination (2020) had 3 support votes
Articles in which this image appears: Red-billed oxpecker, African buffalo
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as before. MER-C 19:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support and that epic damn chin... Brandmeister^talk 19:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Fierce and cute The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Love it. Kodiak Blackjack (talk) 16:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support look at that little bird go. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) male with Oxpecker.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Cage

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2024 at 22:20:46 (UTC)

Original – John Cage in 1988

Reason: Good quality. High resolution
Articles in which this image appears: John Cage etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Rob Bogaerts (Anefo)

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a crop, but checking the original, that is a very justified crop, even if I'd prefer a little less cropping. Certainly unusable in the original form! Support though I'd like better documentation. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 00:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, what is this from? It's similarly sized, but less grainy than the original from the source. Bags under eyes are a lot shinier. What's going on? Is it just a levels adjustment? I think so, but I can't get this with any basic adjustment. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 04:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop and image has been rotated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 02:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:John Cage (1988).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hindenburg disaster

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2024 at 22:20:49 (UTC)

Original – The Hindenburg descending in flames, May 6, 1937

Reason: Iconic photograph. High resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Hindenburg disaster, 1930s etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
Creator: Sam Shere

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Not a great reproduction per Adam. I honestly like this image, I like it a lot, very high EV. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 01:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose – Historical image but poor FPC reproduction The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid that's not a great reproduction: Damage should never be blurry Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 00:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Iconic image, but not FP. Too many flaws and annotation top right. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Photo has been reproduced countless times since the event, becoming effectively a bromide (in journalism, a cliché). – Sca (talk)

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coal tipple in Kenvir, Kentucky

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2024 at 01:49:01 (UTC)

Original – A coal tipple in Kenvir, Kentucky

Alt 1– Perspective fixed

Reason: I'm renominating this image after it failed to reach quorum back in February. This is a high resolution and good quality photograph of Kenvir, Kentucky, a small community in the hills of Harlan County, Kentucky. The community is a coal camp that was founded by the Black Mountain Coal Company in 1919. You can see the company houses in the background.
Articles in which this image appears: Kenvir, Kentucky
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Russell Lee, restored by FatCat96

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 01:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – ~~I am leaning to oppose.~~ There is too much perspective distortion and leaning of verticals. Usually I don't care about such things in historic images, but in this case, the distortion can be corrected (or improved) in an editing software. Bammesk (talk) 03:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bammesk, I believe I've fixed the perspective. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 04:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The perspective is better, but the sharpness is now worse, see for example the vertical grooves on the face of the buildings. I gave it a try as well Here. Yours is sharper though. I am neutral for now. I struck that part of my comment above. Bammesk (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bammesk, I had a go trying to improve the sharpness. Check this image out and tell me what you think. Regards. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 02:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a bit excessive. Check out the third version from the bottom Here, it has your username in the Comment column. I took your file here, I masked out the darker areas, then I applied very light sharpening. I prefer it. For all practical purposes it's your file, so if you approve of it, take it and copy it as yours (no need to credit me). Support either, but prefer this version. Bammesk (talk) 04:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – At 132 words, target article is rather stumpy. – Sca (talk) 15:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Honestly, better a short but fully cited article than a long one with no citations. There's plenty for an FPC blurb. Support either Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – this image is not very visually appealing and does not evidence much skill on the part of the photographer or photo printer. It does an adequate job of illustrating the subject, but by that standard almost every photograph should be "featured". I think that would undermine the concept of FP. –jacobolus (t) 19:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – It represents the article, good EV therefore and size of the article is not a deal breaker IMO. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald: an Alternate image was added to the nomination after you dropped your vote. Could you please update your vote to include or exclude the Alt? Bammesk (talk) 02:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm good with either. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt 1 – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Tipple of Mine ^31. Black Mountain Corporation, 30-31 Mines, Kenvir, Harlan County, Kentucky. - NARA - 541267 - cropped (2).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Onlt the alt has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Company houses for miners in Benito, Kentucky

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2024 at 01:55:15 (UTC)

Original – Coal miners' homes in Benito, Kentucky

Reason: Renominating this image after it failed to reach quorum back in February. This is a high quality image used as lead. High resolution, high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Benito, Kentucky, Coal camp
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Russell Lee, restored by FatCat96

Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 01:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ – First target article is a 100-word stump. – Sca (talk) 15:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aye, but it's the lead of the second, so worse you can say is that the articles are listed in the wrong order. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 15:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Just watch me:) Gray and smudgy. – Oppose -- Sca (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image should not be illustrating the coal town article. Very misleading. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And how is it misleading exactly? If you search “coal camp or “coal town” on google, about 80-90% of images that come up are similar to this one, so I don’t see how it’s misleading. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 23:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a coal camp and the article is coal town. You would need to create coal camp article, then the image would have EV. Coal towns had proper houses etc. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't the article about coal camps too? 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 17:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: The article begins "A coal town, also known as a coal camp or patch..." so either the article is wrong or this is legitimate Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 20:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong I believe, [4]. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support – since I agree with Adam and Charles as well. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pioneer plaque

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 18:41:01 (UTC)

Original – The Pioneer plaques are a pair of gold-anodized aluminum plaques that were placed on board the 1972 Pioneer 10 and 1973 Pioneer 11 spacecraft, featuring a pictorial message, in case either Pioneer 10 or 11 is intercepted by intelligent extraterrestrial life. The plaques show the nude figures of a human male and female along with several symbols that are designed to provide information about the origin of the spacecraft.

Reason: High quality, high EV. I'm surprised it's not featured, the nomination from 2008 (!) was opposed.
Articles in which this image appears: Pioneer plaque, Pioneer program, Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Communication, Diagram, Interstellar probe, Linda Salzman Sagan
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams
Creator: Vectors by Oona Räisänen (User:Mysid); designed by Carl Sagan & Frank Drake; artwork by Linda Salzman Sagan

Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 18:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as yeah it is an incredibly interesting, high quality image, also tasteful nudes. - LegalSmeagolian (talk) 23:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – We have a FP of the actual plaque Here. It should be in the Pioneer plaque article IMO. I see more value in the actual photo. Bammesk (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hmm, I missed that, wasn't able to find it in Featured pictures somehow. In that case, I'm withdrawing the current nomination. Thanks Bammesk! Artem.G (talk) 08:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gi Gi the Sea Lion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2024 at 19:22:40 (UTC)

Original – From Commons: "GiGi, a trained sea lion, nuzzles Capt. Arne Willehag of the USNS Sioux, a Military Sealift Command ocean tugboat in 1983. Gigi and other seals at the time of this photo were being trained to recover underwater anti-submarine rockets as part of the Navy's Quick Find program."

Reason: On technical merits, I think this is a good digitization of a well-composed source image. It's been on the English Wikipedia's page for sea lion for years, and is also used on nine other Wikipedias. (I also think it's kind of charming, personally.) I should be candid in saying that it's 1300px on the short axis, which I know is below the target cutoff. The guidelines said there could by case-by-case exceptions for historical images. Nobody responded when I asked about it on the FPC talk page a month ago, so I guess we'll just have it out here.
Articles in which this image appears: Sea lion
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Original photo taken by Bob Borden of Military Sealift Command in the 1980s. (The source caption says only "1983"; the file name says 1984.) Uploaded by Fishdecoy to Wikipedia in March 2008 and then by Mousse to Commons in July 2008.

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 19:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For EV this would have to be in some military article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – The subpar resolution and unsharp features doesn't make a good FP impression. Passable EV but the lack of a proper source really bothers me. I couldn't find any original source of the image. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Snapshot-style pic. fails to illustrate gist of story re recovering rockets. – Sca (talk) 14:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's something I woild feature if there was an article on it. Underwater photography was not much of a thing back then. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yinka Shonibare CBE at the unveiling of Hibiscus Rising

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2024 at 15:13:18 (UTC)

Original – Yinka Shonibare CBE RA in front of the Hibiscus Rising sculpture, commemorating the death of David Oluwale.

Alt – crop suggestion (CSS image crop)

Reason: This is my first nomination. For full disclosure, uploading this and other images was made as part of a paid project, see WP:GLAM/LEEDS 2023. However, I think this image is a potential nomination for a Featured Pictures as it fulfills, to my mind, the criteria. 1) It is a high standard - Shonibare is centred in the image, with the sculpture behind, with the wider shot showing the urban setting of the work. 2) It is high resolution. 3) I think it is a compelling image, showing not just a Nigerian artist, but a Nigerian disabled artist, next to their work. The sculpture is the first permanent outdoor piece by Shonibare, which makes it significant. Other images of Shonibare are available, uploaded as part of the same project, however I think the composition here says much about his life and career. 4) It has a free license. 5) The image has EV - it is used (via Wikidata) in articles on ARZ, IG and SV Wikipedias, as well as EN. It enhances Wikipedia's content at the intersection of blackness and disability. 6) It is verifiable, see Hibiscus Rising. 7) I think the file description is good - if not I would appreciate feedback on what else to expand. 8) I am unsure what manipulation was made by the original photographer, but it does not seem to me to be manipulated much. Again I would appreciate experienced voices on this.
Articles in which this image appears: Yinka Shonibare, Igbo WP, EN WP, ARZ WP, SV WP
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: David Lindsay, uploaded by User:Lajmmoore

Support as nominator – Lajmmoore (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wikipedia is not a place for corporate/institutional promotion. Also, you are not supposed to upload other people's photos. What you doing is, I'm sure, well intentioned, but I'm very uneasy about people who are paid to upload images to Wikipedia (via Commons) to support Leeds. This is no FP composition, and needs lots of technical work (perspective/shadows), but that was not what I wanted to talk about. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Charlesjsharp thank you for your comments on the image, I understand better now, and fully accept that the image composition is not quite right for this project. In relation to the other points:
- On paid editing: I volunteer as an editor as well, so understand the unease. However I did look carefully in the FP guidelines to see if this kind of nomination from a paid project was precluded, and couldn't see that discussed. Could you point me to the guideline that I missed? Featured Pictures have already come from paid projects, for exmaple this Talismanic shirt & this view of Japan and this coin of Nader Shah. In comparison, I've made some DYK nominations both as part of paid projects and as an everyday volunteer, and the consensus there seems to be as long as you are open and honest about project you were paid as part of, nomination is OK.
This tutorial is where I got my information from. It states no promotional photos. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- In terms of uploading other people's photos - this is an image that was shared under and open licence. Again, I checked the FP guidlines and couldn't see where nominating someone else's image was precluded from this project. I saw that there were many historic images included, as well as images of artworks and objects, where the original artist/photographer isn't (couldn't be due to time passed) involved. Criteria 4 just says an image must be under free licence, it doesn't say that the nominater must also be the original photographer - this mirrors the three nominations above, where people have nominated others' work.
@Charlesjsharp: That page says: "you can’t upload someone else’s [...] promotional photos [unless] the author granted permission for anyone to use, copy, modify, and sell it – by releasing it under a free license", which (poor grammar notwithstanding) is exactly what happened here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very happy to retract this nomination or for it to be as closed due to the composition, thank to the instructive comments made Lajmmoore (talk) 07:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Thanks a lot for uploading and nominating for FP. But as Charles mentioned, the composition of the image is not at par with a featured picture we are looking for. For reference, have a look at WP:FP, especially the people subsection to understand the composition and encyclopedic value we want in an image. It is used as a lead image in an infobox, but it does not represent the subject as it is supposed to. The subject(s) are not well defined and shadows are all over the place. Also, you may look at the other nominations to see how a nomination is framed and how the articles that use the image is mentioned. Thanks and happy editing :) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much @The Herald for these constructive comments. It's a lesson in interpretation for me: from this feedback it sounds like for the people section its more usual portrait kind of images that you're supportive of? Lajmmoore (talk) 07:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I added a crop suggestion Alt. Also suggest a slight level adjust to pull up the darker areas. The sculpture is ~30 feet tall, so I don't mind the wide angle distortion, it's a part of the composition. I see no issues with copyright or promotion. Lajmmoore, usage in non-English Wiki articles isn't relevant. Bammesk (talk) 16:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional Support Alt, if the darker areas are lifted slightly. Bammesk (talk) 00:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted no license on Commons. MER-C 11:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MER-C, do you know why it was deleted? I see the stated rationale here, but when I had checked it on Commons (if I remember right), the file page had a CC BY-SA 2.0 license and it had a reviewed-by FlickreviewR bot template. The source link is Here. It's very much the same as this image, copyright-wise. Bammesk (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a Commons admin, so I cannot answer your question. MER-C 13:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will ask on Commons. Bammesk (talk) 13:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for picking this up @Bammesk - I really appreciate it. I believe there was a mistake over on Commons and it is now undeleted Lajmmoore (talk) 23:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that was strange. I reverted the CommonsDelinker bot. Bammesk (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado outbreak of March 31 – April 1, 2023

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2024 at 17:45:25 (UTC)

Original – Map of confirmed tornadoes and tornado warnings by the National Weather Service during the tornado outbreak of March 31 - April 1, 2023

Reason: High EV value. Showcases the historic and third largest tornado outbreak in history (147 tornadoes). Image also satisfies all criteria, including size being 3,507 × 2,480 pixels.
Articles in which this image appears: List

FP category for this image: Maps
Creator: Wxtrackercody

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question This appears to be OR by the uploader, rather than data from an 'official' source. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: Its not. All that data is publicly available. NOAA releases all the info about tornadoes (start and end locations with coords), path lengths, strength, and all that on the Storm Events Database or the Damage Assessment Toolkit, where a person and straight up see the exact path and even what structures were hit. The Iowa Environmental Mesonet has every tornado warning (and ever NWS warning for that fact) downloadable publicly. The Storm Prediction Center keeps a detailed record of every outlook issued. They also have a ton of detailed info (like coords for tornadoes reported) and everything like that (March 31 on the SPC). No OR at all. In short, all info is from the U.S. government or Iowa State University. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think it is particularly visually pleasing to look at, it is a bit cluttered and unclear what I am looking at. I understand there will be a blurb with it but I feel like this is not the best of the best. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 22:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – It's informative and hence good EV. Sources are sorted out and looks good to me. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Agree with LegalSmeagolian. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ That's apparently a thing. Something about reproducing photos of photos of photos and adding details back in. More common with daguerrotypes, where there isn't an easy way to reproduce them.
^ At least, in the first public performance. There was a hastily done private performance in the UK to try to gain two countries' copyright

[1] That's apparently a thing. Something about reproducing photos of photos of photos and adding details back in. More common with daguerrotypes, where there isn't an easy way to reproduce them.

[2] At least, in the first public performance. There was a hastily done private performance in the UK to try to gain two countries' copyright

[1]

[2]