IMatthew (talk · contribs) It has been a while since I've had an editor review, and I believe I have improved since my last review. I'd like to see what some of the community thinks about my editing skills, and things of the sort. -- iMatthew T.C. 18:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Hi. Since coming onto Wikipedia, you have gained development mostly on articles, and have gained a knowledge of Wikpedia's main guidelines while working on professional wrestling articles. I would recommend moving on further, to contributing in deletion discussions to help clear backlogs, or to tag articles for deletion if you feel they should be deleted. I feel you should work on a more wider variety of articles to gauge further valuable information - are there any other article areas you like apart from wrestling? This can help in RFA's having a wide knowledge of information. Overall, you are a very good user with good knowledge as a whole, and I look forward to seeing you at RfA in the near future. D.M.N. (talk) 12:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dave! I'll take what you said, and put it to good use. I'm thinking about expanding/sourcing some Survivor articles. -- iMatthew T.C. 21:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I am pleased with all of the articles I've managed to expand; specifically all of the articles that I've helped get to Good article status.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I have not be in any conflicts over editing. I can always tell when something along the lines of an edit war is coming by the actions of other users, and I also make sure to avoid those edit wars. I never let users get to me, or cause stress to me. If I have to deal with it in the future, I will just keep a cool head.