- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. TigerShark (talk) 23:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- War of Empires (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod. "As web-based content with no assertion of importance, this could actually be a speedy deletion under criteria A7, but due to its history I am using a PROD instead. No assertion of notability (WP:N), no references (WP:V)"[1] Hu12 (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, so it fails WP:V. TJ Spyke 09:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per origional prod--Hu12 (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 17:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability, none coming from a google search. Someoneanother 02:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unknown game, not notable. — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 07:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. WP:AFD is not a vote. The relevant discussion (and a keep vote for those who believe AFD is a vote) about whether or not this article can be improved to meet our standards is on the talk page. Kusma (talk) 11:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability, just a bunch of listings on, well, listings sites. --Stormie (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.