Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The AIRSCREEN Company GmbH & Co. KG

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The AIRSCREEN Company GmbH & Co. KG

edit
The AIRSCREEN Company GmbH & Co. KG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally non-notable and very promotional article, created by an SPA who has tried to distribute related images (company material) throughout a number of articles (see File:Inflatable_Billboard_in_front_of_a_sports_stadium.jpg, for instance, inserted here). (The account is old, but I might still block it as a spam-only account.) Anyway, I can't find anything on this company in Google News or Books: not notable. Drmies (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep "Airscreen GmbH isn't just an ordinary company that produce wide variety of consumer products. Airscreen is original and unique product that completely changed the perspective of open air cinemas. This article explains invention and history of Airscreen providing all the general information about this product. Original Airscreen is present in more than 75 countries worldwide so that should be a good reason to keep this article!" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boris85 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC) — Boris85 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Comment. Since all of the sources mentioned by the above IP's are either blogs, press reports, or sales pitches, they are unreliable. Can you provide reliable sources of notability?--Larry (talk) 04:50, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think it needs pointing out that these comments are not just fishy but also fail to point to reliable sources. There's nothing here but company talk and a blog or two. Drmies (talk) 16:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

or here's a scan from an international cinema magazine (non advertorial): *Keep http://www.airscreen.com/fileadmin/pdf_flyer/2011_07_Screentrade_Mag_016_017_MarketPlace_V4_02.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.143.3.38 (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC) — 80.143.3.38 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Duplicate vote struck. --BDD (talk) 16:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate vote struck. --BDD (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm tempted to close this as delete myself. It's clear most or all of the keep votes are connected—probably both to each other and the company. Notability hasn't been demonstrated due to the lack if independent, reliable sources on the article or in this discussion. The New Yorker is a good source, sure, but depicting one of the company's products on a cover means precisely jack squat in terms of WP:N, nor is it clear that they're specifically depicting an Airscreen rather than a similar product. --BDD (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_AIRSCREEN_Company_GmbH_%26_Co._KG&oldid=1071216872"