Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spectral Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The talk page does not look like a problem; it is merely a redirect to Talk:Spectral network. --MelanieN (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spectral Networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was a reasonably long-time stub (2011, tagged with few edits since then) for WP:Companies without WP:NOTABILITY or even a company website that I originally prodded. Another editor noticed that it shared a name with "spectral network", a math concept without a wiki, and changed the page to reflect that instead. A more recent editor moved that text to a separate spectral network page per WP:MOS and returned some of the original stub content here with a redirect. I still don't think it meets notability as a company. Since we've had a few hands in this pie it makes sense to have others look at it. (Also, if this doesn't pass AfD, the talk page is broken, and I don't know how to fix that.) Alaynestone (talk) 23:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Alaynestone (talk) 23:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Alaynestone (talk) 23:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unreferenced stub, delete per failing WP:V (before failing WP:NCOMPANY too). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as I found nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment for Admin: If this passes AfD (and it looks like it will), the "talk page" is actually the one for spectral network so it shouldn't be deleted or the real spectral network article needs a new talk page. Not sure how it happened in all the updating, but I do know I'll make it worse if I try to fix it. Alaynestone (talk) 21:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.