Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sort-of-ponytail
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as a non-notable neologism. Note: Shortly after deletion, I realized that I mistakenly closed this discussion 1 day early. I'm not restoring the page and re-opening the debate myself, since there were no objections to deletion, but if anybody wishes for this discussion to run for another day, contact me. JamieS93 16:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sort-of-ponytail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Neologism. Oscarthecat (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I foud 0 sources for this. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Maybe speedy. WP:NEO. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google search indicates it's a neologistic term coined by the creator of the article. Fails WP:OR. Deconstructhis (talk) 17:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism is being rather kind to it. Blueboy96 20:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.