Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Dikun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Dikun

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMMA. His highest ranking by Fight Matrix was 26th in the world bantamweight rankings, which is short of the top 10 requirement. Also fails WP:GNG. The sources in the article are mostly routine coverage, and I failed to find anything significant to pass GNG. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 02:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, United States of America, and California. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 02:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly fails to meet WP:NMMA, not surprising given a career record of 9 wins and 8 losses. The only sources I could find for him were MMA databases, fight results, and fight promotional articles. None of these are sufficient to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 23:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.