Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Jackson Wiley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 22:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Jackson Wiley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Edited this article down as it contained much unsubstantiated and outdated information. Now I am wondering if this is enough to fulfill WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC - I did further searches and there is some material but it either is linked to his father who was a director or announcements. I failed to find any reviews related to performances either as a conductor or as a guitarist. Karst (talk) 07:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not entirely sure but maybe delete for now as although my searches found results here, here and here but this may ultimately not be enough so delete for now. SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - as per nom and above editors. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 15:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Lacks coverage and the article content doesn't suggest anything that would qualify under WP:NMUSIC. Brian heim composer (talk) 18:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.