Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scanner (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scanner (comics)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic fails WP:GNG. There are no reliable sources discussing the character that I can see. TTN (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: S. BOZ (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Herostratus (talk) 00:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: S as no coverage for unique page. Tulkijasi (talk) 07:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to List of Marvel Comics characters: S due to GNG issues. SOFTDELETE please. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: S. --Rtkat3 (talk) 00:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm actually going to recommend Deletion over merger for this one. I searched for sources using both the "Scanner", "Screener" and "Sarah Ryall" names, and found absolutely no coverage in reliable, secondary sources, not even in any of the usual "Top Ten" style comic lists. Without a single, reliable, secondary source covering her in any way, I don't think this character is notable enough to even be included in the character list. Rorshacma (talk) 19:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Rorshacma. No sigcov or other indication of notability. Avilich (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is another character that fails WP:GNG, but the name is so generic that I don't believe that a redirect is suitable. My first thought was it referred to the technology. --Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.