Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesh Auti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ramesh Auti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources are of mixed quality, a few don't even mention the subject, and the ones that do only mention his existence, frequently in a list. Little of the actual content even matches the claimed source, and it may be promotional given the username of the creator (speedy deletion tags were already removed once). Searching myself, I see little-to-nothing that could establish notability, and the article is so poorly written that there's nothing here that could be kept in a longshot attempt to build an article. The creator had already been told of the myriad issues at AFC. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - not sure why my CSD nomination got removed. This page was previously deleted. And also, the talk page is a mess. Limmidy (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it should be speedily deleted. It was the article creator who removed the speedy deletion template. --bonadea contributions talk 19:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Xegma(talk) 19:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there adding some reliable sources in this page. Can you check it. I think it should be ok to keep page Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No need to draftify. Note that the article creator moved the article to draftapace, removed the AfD notice, and c&p recreates the article without the afd template. --bonadea contributions talk 18:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While this is not a vote (since my opinion can be inferred from the initial entry), none of the sources added provide even a spec of notability, and they're mostly YouTube videos. Frankly, this is in WP:SALT territory. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wp.Ramesh Auti. Might be a candidate for G5 speedy deletion as well.--bonadea contributions talk 19:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there adding some reliable sources in this page. Can you check it. I think it should be ok to keep page. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 01:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the new sources is reliable, independent, or in any way useful as a source. Here's an overview of the sources in the current version of the article:

**Source assessment table: prepared by User:Bonadea**
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://nettv4u.com/celebrity/bhojpuri/editor/ramesh-auti	blatant promotion	nettv4u.com is generally unreliable, see WP:ICTFSOURCES	very brief	✘ No
http://www.bhojpurifilmiduniya.com/2016/07/ek-rajai-teen-lugai.html	?	Claims to be a blog, clearly a content scraper	No information about Auti, just mentions his name in a cast list	✘ No
https://www.marathifilmdata.com/chitrapat/katibandha/	?	? A database of Marathi films, no information about publisher	No information about Auti, just mentions his name in a staff list	✘ No
https://siraj7.rssing.com/chan-29175398/all_p17.html	?	Self-published source (blog)	Auti's name is mentioned once	✘ No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPCNQTNAc8Y	A film uploaded to Youtube, used as a source for the fact that Auti worked on it	The film itself	No information about Auti	✘ No
https://cityliveindia.com/city/dhanbad/Article?CL=Harshita-Ojha-will-be-seen-soon-in-a-short-film-Sachet-959055	Press release	Promotion piece	Auti is not even mentioned!	✘ No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xLrlKU60rQ	A film uploaded to Youtube, used as a source for the fact that Auti worked on it	The film itself	No information about Auti	✘ No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7ksqg94Me0	A film uploaded to Youtube, used as a source for the fact that Auti worked on it	The film itself	No information about Auti	✘ No
https://www.magzmumbai.com/web-series-hidden-on-ping-pong-ott-platform-from-16th-july/	Press release	Promotional blurb	No mention of Auti	✘ No
https://glamgold.com/ping-pong-otts-web-series-hidden-poster-launched/	Churnalism based on the same press release as the previous source	Promotional piece	No mention of Auti in this version either	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Exactly zero reliable sources, and none of them has any information about Auti whatsoever. --bonadea contributions talk 10:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Bonadea's source analysis; no sign of notability of any flavour. (No objection to speedying, if preferred.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Wp.ramesh wiki is now indefinitely blocked for persistent disruptive editing. ----Kinu ^t/_c 18:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.