- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nufy8 00:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seems to be Notable. Cannot find any Google references about the author or his book abakharev 00:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - per WP:HOAX --Ineffable3000 01:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - per nom, but why not prod first? -Harmil 01:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete dumb. Danny Lilithborne 02:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I could not find the book at the Library of Congress http://catalog.loc.gov or the British Library http://catalogue.bl.uk --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does WP:HOAX cover books? Michael Billington (talk •contribs) 08:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:HOAX does not specifically mention books. However, stating that a book is published when it is not, is obviously a hoax. --Ineffable3000 23:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. BTLizard 08:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete author, book, non existent in standard catalogues. If he is Russian, maybe the name is misspelt? QuiteUnusual 19:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in its current form. galar71 21:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above comments. RFerreira 22:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - CrazyRussian talk/email 11:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.