Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Majorly 21:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Non-notable law firm. Fails WP:CORP (Criteria for companies). Or at least notability not asserted. Edcolins 18:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Chovain 18:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notability. ju66l3r 22:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I just noticed there is a recent string of Israeli law firms and lawyers up for AfD and all of them have come from either User:Ju66l3r or User:Edcolins and with one exception, all of them include votes by one or the other, depending on who created the AfD. They include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yigal Arnon, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Horowitz & Co., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamburger Evron & Co., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eitan Law Group and this one. I find this very troubling possible vote stacking. At User talk:Ju66l3r, there is actual discussion between the two in deleting ALL Category:Law firms in Israel articles! I won't charge an anti-israeli POV, but with all the anti-Semitism I've encountered recently in Wikipedia, I'm very disturbed that law firms or lawyers from this country are singled out for deletion. --Oakshade 23:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Link to my response to your baseless suggestions. Thanks. ju66l3r 01:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This came up at WP:ANI and it looks like the bias allegation is well-intentioned but groundless. I'm glad some Wikipedians watch out for that kind of misuse. This nomination appears to be based upon policy without any unseemly taint. DurovaCharge 02:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP... Addhoc 19:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.