Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PayPal World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm going to go ahead and invoke WP:SNOW: there's no way this article would survive the AfD. We can reconsider if something happens in the future to lead to this company getting significant news coverage, but for now, the company does not meet our notability criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 01:47, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PayPal World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirected by RileyBugz to PayPal, and reverted by the creator. At first seems like a good redirect, but the company isn't actually linked to PayPal, despite what the infobox claims by linking it to Confinity. The problem is that PayPal doesn't exist in Pakistan, and from what I can tell PayPal doesn't have any service named this. Did a source check and I couldn't find any press that would meet ORG or GNG. Deletion looks to be the best option at this time. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or Speedy delete under G11. Sentences like "PayPal World is the first and one of the largest Internet payment companies.. PayPal World extends its services to all over the world|" aren't exactly neutral. This is not to mention the subject's lack of notability. This supports a deletion if G11 is not applicable. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 22:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.