Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside of ramsay street
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 09:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Outside of ramsay street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod (no reason given). Unsourced speculation about Australian soap-opera spinoff supposedly premiering in September 2009. No useful hits on Google News or Google Web. Can't tell if it's a deliberate hoax or just wishful thinking; but either way, without verifiability in reliable sources, it'll have to go. Hqb (talk) 09:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unless references can be provided it isn't a confirmed spin-off. Canterbury Tail talk 13:14, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 13:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - and I've deleted the link posted in the article for further information. florrie 14:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The "source" of this also says Bjork is dead and Chris Brown is on the down low. Are we really going to trust them about a new soap that going by the Neighbors fandom would have already had 10,000 fansites by now? I see the balls dropping on this one. Nate • (chatter) 23:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the reasons given. Gosox5555 (talk) 23:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- dnt go on celed click on the celebritygossip1002.webs.com and click on TV/MOVIE link for info —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.171.195.252 (talk) 08:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax. WWGB (talk) 00:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. I remember a very similar article about a purported Neighbours spin-off about two years ago which was deleted and the name was similar if not identical... (but I can't find the deletion logs). --Canley (talk) 06:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I think it's just wishful thinking by fans who don't understand Wikipedia but obviously not appropriate. Sarah 10:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Well intentioned but highly speculative. Wikipedia is neither a crystal ball nor a fantasy engine. Orderinchaos 10:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for reasons given above. --Roisterer (talk) 03:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.