Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observe Hack Make

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus argued that the subject had not received coverage which would have demonstrated notability via GNG j⚛e decker ^talk 06:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Observe Hack Make

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy declined. Advance publicity for a conference. Wikipedia is not for advertising. Can't reasearch notability of the event because it hasn't happened yet (" Your search - "Observe Hack Make" - did not match any news results."). Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. There's no deadline, plenty of time to summarize all the coverage of this event after (if) it happens. Wtshymanski (talk) 15:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is simply WP:TOOSOON for an article for this event. I wasn't able to see any extensive coverage for this event in any independent and reliable sources. You can sometimes have upcoming events have enough notability to warrant an entry, but it's fairly rare and usually only occurs in extremely high profile events. This is not one of those events. I don't really have a problem with the original editor userfying it. I do want to note that some of the previous hacker conferences such as Hacking at Random look to have some notability issues as well. If they're all part of one large conference, it might be better to make one large entry encompassing all of them rather than a page for each year's individual conference.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability - that of the previous conference doesn't transfer to this. No independent referencing. Too soon. Peridon (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with above. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.