Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tiranno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Seven Sins: The Tyrant Ascending. Consensus is to redirect, (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Tiranno

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested redirect. Does this need its' own article? I dream of horses (T) @ 19:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect On the one hand, Tiranno is the main character of The Seven Sins: The Tyrant Ascending and Black Scorpion the Tyrant Reborn, so he's arguably more deserving of his own page than any other character in a book. But even so, the only references on the page are from The Seven Sins: The Tyrant Ascending. Maybe if there were outside sources discussing the character, such as a character study or book review, I'd be more willing to consider a standalone article appropriate. As it is, it should be redirected to the book page, or a possibly a new page on the book series. Maybe character info could be added there if non-primary references are found. clpo13_(talk) 17:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as searches at Books, News, browser and Highbeam all found links for this so there's not much for a separate article. SwisterTwister talk 21:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.