Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark K. Bilbo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark K. Bilbo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although the first AfD's consensus was keep, my searches found nothing to suggest better sourcing and improvement with the best results being here (a blog and review here and there) and AfD has certainly changed since January 2006. Pinging the only still active users @Cyde, JzG, and Guettarda:. SwisterTwister talk 21:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 08:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not finding anything that could be used to source this article other than evidence that he did indeed write the books listed here. If he is the same MK Bilbo, he may also be known for participation in alt.atheism discussions, but again I don't see anything other than the primary source itself. LaMona (talk) 17:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.