- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:27, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Liesl Laurie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as subject easily crosses verifiability and notability thresholds with references in reliable third-party sources such as [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. - Dravecky (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - as a winner of a National Beauty pageant title she is notable. As Dravecky points out there are enough reliable third party sources, which will increase over the time spent in the role of Miss SA. Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the above statements. She is Miss South Africa 2015 and this makes her notable, especially to our country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.111.30.100 (talk) 14:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.