Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let Go (KMFDM album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator‎. (non-admin closure) ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let Go (KMFDM album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable album Jax 0677 (talk) 11:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:NALBUM. Multiple SIGCOV reviews in the first page of Google results: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Reminder to nominator to check for sources WP:BEFORE nominating an article for deletion. Jfire (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply - I did check for sources days ago, and the number of reliable articles was close to none. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More reviews: [5], [6], [7], [8]. Jfire (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - The PROD was contested without immediately adding sources to the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficient reviews to meet WP:NALBUM. I've added some of the reviews to the article in case that is a sticking point. Skynxnex (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: KMFDM is one the most popular industrial bands in the world. Sufficient reviews exist to meet notability. Will expand the article. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This nomination is illegitimate because there is no evidence that the nominator put sufficient effort into a WP:BEFORE search upon PROD'ding the article (8 Feb), this AfD appears to be purely an act of disagreement with the removed PROD, and the nominator did not acknowledge the possibilities offered by WP:ATD (in which the accepted procedure for a notable band's album is to redirect when necessary) or WP:NEXIST or WP:NOTCLEANUP. Regardless, this entire time the album has had plenty of reviews from reliable music publications as seen above. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw nomination - Though I actually did look for references when the album first came out and came up empty, I support withdrawing this AFD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.