Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasma Science Fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kasma Science Fiction

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable free online magazine that has had a few notable writers featured but none of the pieces appear to be independently notable and the magazine itself has very little coverage from reliable sources. Article was created by an SPA and then kept up by an editor who appears be the website's founder. Only one reference is included and it not reliable GPL93 (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NMEDIA/WP:NWEBSITE. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be deleted. Kasma is a long established short fiction magazine. Writers researching potential markets to submit to would find this article useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skay2020 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note. This user has made few or no other edits outside of this Afd. GPL93 (talk) 10:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Being around for a long time is not a reason for keeping an article and Wikipedia is not a market research site. Best, GPL93 (talk) 10:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 02:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.