Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocelyn Ducloux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jocelyn Ducloux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

General standard for football players is at least competition in top-level national league if there are no reliable secondary sources. This is an amateur player. Fails GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. General standard for presumed notability for football players, which lives at WP:NFOOTBALL, is having played in a fully professional league, as listed at WP:FPL, or at senior international level. Mr Ducloux played for eight seasons in the French second tier, which is listed at WP:FPL, as verified by the external link already in the article. I've written a few explicit words and changed the ext link header to a references. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Struway2 (talk) 15:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.