Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icosikaitetragon
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was close, article has been redirected to polygon. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Icosikaitetragon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete, no content that isn't already duplicated in Polygon. Professor Fiendish (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in one or another way: just delete, or merge into polygon or move to wiktionary. No chance for a standalone article. Materialscientist (talk) 10:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. If this really must be kept, consider moving to icositetragon. By the way, nobody uses tetracosagon. Professor M. Fiendish 04:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.