Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBZL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IBZL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a "thought experiment" on Internet bandwith, with unclear notability. The article has a few sources, but #1 is SPS, #2-5 source the NGA background (which is a separate topic), and #6-7 seem to focus not directly on IBZL, but on succeeding related topics and applications that may use results from IBZL workshops. Concerns about notability have been raised on the talkpage 2 years ago, but haven't been addressed. Disclaimer: I am no scientist, so this should have a close and thorough look by topic experts. But without additional sources the topic seems to fail WP:GNG. See also the closely related article Triple Task Method, that has been created by the same SPA editor. Google search has a few more hits compared with TTM, but nothing in-depth - and the search is conflated with other IBZL abbrevations. GermanJoe (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I see nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 05:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.