Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill Street, London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nomination was withdrawn with no contrary !votes. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 14:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hill Street, London

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of any notability: it exists, and two offices are located there, and there's a photo of its corner, but otherwise it's just a street. Deprodded without commented. PamD 09:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This street is located in the rich area of Mayfair in the middle of London. All such historic streets are notable as there have been countless books about the topography of London over the centuries. Please see WP:BEFORE. Warden (talk) 10:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep thanks to the unequivocal demonstration by Warden of the notability and interest of this topic with solid sources. The article can clearly be developed further, but there is already more than sufficient reason to keep it here. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome but we had an edit conflict just now. I think I've kept it together but will pass the torch now, to avoid further confusion... Warden (talk) 13:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is now no question about notability. The street clearly has an interesting history, and the article deserves expansion (Warden asked if I was interested). Google Books says there are about 241,000 results for the exact title. There will not be anything like that many in preview mode, but there will be plenty. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article needs significant improvement, but there's plenty of potential for expansion,and it already seems notable. PhilMacD (talk) 18:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Most of the coverage seems to be no more than a mention, but put together there's probably enough for an article. Peter James (talk) 19:26, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep I think it's clear that this meets guidelines.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notability has been demonstrated courtesy of excellent work by Colonel Warden .The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination: it is now obviously a useful article on a notable street. At the point when I nominated it, it was still the uninformative stub, with no indication of notability, which had been dePRODded without comment five weeks earlier. A quick google showed nothing but addresses. It's good to see it expanded now, but it would have been helpful if the dePRODder had given an informative edit summary or talk page comment, or just added a bit of sourced content to indicate notability at that stage. PamD 8:22 am, Today (UTC+1)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.