Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD media player

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 10:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HD media player (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This unreferenced article is a fork of set-top box with an imaginary or very uncommon title. (As far as I am aware, an "HD media player" is a "high-definition media player", not what this article thinks.) I wouldn't say "no" to a merge with set-top box article, but what can be possibly be merged? Codename Lisa (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:18, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - This area of coverage needs improved organization. Deleting stray bits and pieces is not going to help. Editors need time to sort this out. Consider a merge to Media server. ~KvnG 17:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete for the following reasons:
    1. No source – Not even one source is present in the article
    2. Lack of notability – Does not conform to WP:GNG
    3. Neologism – Articles on neologism are not allowed. I have never seen the word "HD media player" used for anything. "HD", when comes with "media player", always means high-definition. So, if I describe User:Pjoef's statement above as "BS", are you willing to assume good faith and think that perhaps I meant "beyond smart" or "beautiful statement"? I am not going to bet my life on it.
    4. Fake info – I tested some of the items listed in the article, such as "GoFlex TV (STAJ100)", "Seagate Freeagent" and several "Eminent". They were HD, alright, but the company website made it clear that they are HD as in "high definition" not as in "having hard disk".
    5. Spacer filler by nature – If you disregard the title and lead, what do you get? Some content that, if had source, was a candidate for any modern media player article, be it hardware or software. For example, read HD media player § Market niche. You can imagine it is put in Windows Media Player article. Or read HD media player § Formats, resolutions and file systems. Could be part of any notable set-top box article.
Fleet Command (talk) 12:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.