Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwynn Valley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 22:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gwynn Valley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article doesn't have any reliable sources, it doesn't meet the WP:GNG, it was created by someone that probably works there (Abbybooklover), and therefore it's fundamentally written like an advertisement. Meteorname (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I've tried to find sources too, but no luck.
Jonathan Deamer (talk) 19:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.