- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Group of Chaos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is impossible to establish the notability of this group. There are two "sources", but none of them mentions the subject of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- delete as unverifiable. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:47, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Source are scrap. No Google news regarding the group, and there was several arrests of members of the Anonymous group over the last 3-6 month. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep talk 19:43 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. No sources available to verify: existence of the group, 2-7 people, hacking exploits etc -- Green Cardamom (talk) 03:49, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete no notability nor verifiability. Cavarrone 19:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.