Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternity's Crossing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 00:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eternity's Crossing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem to meet any WP:NMUSIC unfortunately, after doing a WP:BEFORE I couldn't find much other than the local article about the band playing at the town church and that's already cited. BuySomeApples (talk) 00:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support if nobody can come up with other sources or evidence of notability. It doesn't sound particularly notable, and as long as the nominator took the time to look for sources that might demonstrate it, deletion is probably appropriate. It's a relief to see WP:BEFORE observed in the nomination—far too many articles get nominated for deletion without any effort to establish whether the topic is notable, leaving it up to everyone else to do the work for the nominator, and more often than not spending the day demonstrating that the subject was in fact at least marginally notable. P Aculeius (talk) 13:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.