Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Santini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Airwolf. Black Kite (talk) 18:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Santini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no reliable secondary sources to establish the independent notability of this fictional character. Notability of the series does not confer notability onto the individual characters. Tagged for reference improvement for six years but those sources don't exist. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 16:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Google news archives show many mentions of the character that certainly establish its existence but not the sort of secondary sources upon which an article that discusses the character in real-world (not in-universe) terms necessary to build and sustain an article. The idea that the character is somehow more significant than the actor who portrayed him is ludicrous on its face. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 17:24, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.