Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dehla Chattha

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dehla Chattha

edit
Dehla Chattha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and fails notability guidelines —Шαмıq ☪ тαʟκ✍ @ 22:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • tentative Keep It does not fail the notability guideline because all villages are notable . But it is necessary for the information to be verified by some sort of source, even a non-independent official web site. and some editing to remove the list of local dignitaries is clearly needed. DGG ( talk ) 23:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • This village is still non-notable. No sources cover ‘Dehla Chattha’ village. According to WP:GNG:
If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list.
  • "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.[1]
And here the issue is that no source covers the subject, so it fails the very first requirement for being notable. And as to verifiability, agreed with DGG.—Шαмıq ☪ тαʟκ✍ @ 19:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As Phil Bridger noted, this village appears on Google Maps and Google has a reputation for fact checking when it comes to their maps. Thus the village existence is verifiable and per WP:NPLACE, articles on villages that are verifiable are generally kept. --Mark viking (talk) 00:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Even if material added to the article is completely unsourced?—Шαмıq ☪ тαʟκ✍ @ 13:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's not completely unsourced, but is sourced by the coordinates link to Google Maps. I would add that Google Maps, although usually correct, has been known to include incorrect information. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
  1. ^ Examples: The 360-page book by Sobel and the 528-page book by Black on IBM are plainly non-trivial. The one sentence mention by Walker of the band Three Blind Mice in a biography of Bill Clinton (Martin Walker (1992-01-06). "Tough love child of Kennedy". The Guardian. In high school, he was part of a jazz band called Three Blind Mice.) is plainly trivial.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dehla_Chattha&oldid=1137777712"