Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Allen Brooks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SoWhy 13:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David Allen Brooks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: as non-notable actor. Quis separabit? 07:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:58, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep Even though a lot may not be written about him, he has been in numerous american tv shows throughout the years. Livinginthepink (talk) 15:20, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete having lots of bit parts does not add up to notability. Does not pass the multiple significant roles in notable producetions guideline.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep The fact that the has worked in so many shows makes him notable enough for wikipedia. Notability does not mean "being famous". Notability means having recognition in a field, which he has as evidenced by the parts he has played. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.93.195 (talk) 16:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC) — 67.164.93.195 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- I can't find significant coverage about him, fails
[[WP:NACTOR]]
as well as[[WP:BASIC]]
/[[WP:GNG]]
, delete per[[WP:DEL8]]
. Sam Sailor 18:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, as a search turned up no quality sources.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:47, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.