Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danila Khakhalev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danila Khakhalev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per recent discussion Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#The criteria of WP:NSPORT here are too inclusive : there is clear consensus that no subject-specific notability guideline, including Notability (sports) is a replacement for or supercedes the General Notability Guideline. Arguments must be more refined than simply citing compliance with a subguideline of WP:NSPORTS in the context of an Articles for Deletion discussion. I did a research on Danila Khakhalev - no significant coverage about this footballer, no statistics, awards or any other significant achievements, therefore I propose this page for deletion. Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:59, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 22:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 22:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep per all of the above. Another disruptive, time-wasting nomination by this editor who is in breach of WP:AGF. As Smartyllama says, "the RfC said not to nominate articles for deletion indiscriminately". There appear to be several of these attributed to the same editor. Jack | talk page 06:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.