Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Edwin Adams
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Daniel Edwin Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor, fails WP:ENTERTAINER. References point to one trivial role and 2nd prize in student journalism awards. Not enough to meet the WP:GNG. Tassedethe (talk) 18:27, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- delete - WP:TOOSOON maybe he will go on to be a famous actor or journalist and have a Wikipedia article or maybe things wont work out and he will go back to being a paramedic and saving people but one of those people who have a real impact on the world that does not lead to an article in Wikipedia. But we are not in the business of making a prediction it will go one way rather than the other. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This guy has a role so minor in a film it is described as "parishioner". Our criteria is 2 significant roles in notable films, he has one insigniifant role in a notable film. He is not at present notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete seems to fail WP:NACTOR. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 10:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.