Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoPatient (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CoPatient

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article by paid editor on nonnotable company--" The company works directly with consumers by analyzing and negotiating their medical bills with hospitals in order to lower health care expenses" is a phrase that belongs in advertisement or their web page, not an encycopedia . All the references are brief notices of initial funding as a start up, which in practice means what we call "not yet notable". DGG ( talk ) 02:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Looks WP:TOOSOON per normal AfD
Speedy Delete per undisclosed paid editing. If we don't delete them before they get paid, we are in effect complicit by shutting the door after the horse... Widefox; talk 03:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NCORP. If we can establish a consensus through AfD that non-notable and promotional articles will be speedily deleted it can only help the project. per WP:IAR Jbh ^Talk 15:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.