Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boom! (System of a Down song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 19:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boom! (System of a Down song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page has been as possibly not meeting the notability guideline for nearly a year now, and it's clear that the sourcing has not improved much in that time. It didn't chart anywhere, and across the six sources, the last two are Discogs, which fails WP:UGC, one is a link to a Reddit AMA with Serj Tankian and John Dolmayan (likely an outdated one too, given that it does not specifically direct to anything about the song itself, at least on my end), and one is a link to watch its music video on MTV, which absolutely does not prove any notability whatsoever. The MTV News article does not discuss the song independently, and only the New York Times article comes anywhere close to meeting WP:SIGCOV, but even then it's in the context of music videos commenting on war (including the then-current one in Iraq) receiving airtime, or lack thereof, on MTV at the time. To me, given all these issues, this should just be a redirect to Steal This Album!, but rather than being bold and redirecting, I figured I'd open up discussion here to see what the community thinks. JeffSpaceman (talk) 21:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revising to neutral. Looks more like it was a sloppy creation, but there is sourcing out there. Sergecross73 msg me 01:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. The article was definitely in poor shape at the time the AfD started, but it's already been improved significantly and more than enough sources have been added/listed above to cover notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 07:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Agree with users above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.170.194.91 (talk) 09:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - For a little historical perspective, in the early years of Wikipedia there were articles for almost every single System of a Down song, created by over-enthusiastic fans. Many of those have since been redirected to their parent albums as not being independently notable. On the contrary, this song really did get extra notice from the reliable media due to the controversy surrounding its video, and for making a certain political impact in its day. The sources located by the voters above are sufficient. Also, an unreliable source like a Reddit discussion link can simply be removed. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:41, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Good finds by the users above, especially this one which I think is well within the territory of WP:SIGCOV.--NØ 17:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.