Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Eggleton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Strikerforce^Talk 16:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Eggleton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Your results may vary, but my search turned up only interviews and passing mentions of his legendary greatness. Obviously established in the sci-fi/horror art illustration scene, but article has three sources and I cannot find more. GNG Fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep won the Hugo Award for Best Professional Artist multiple times. Passes WP:ARTIST. Vexations (talk) 02:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - if we can get some citations for them, the Hugo Award and Chesley Award are pretty significant. Also, he's got an asteroid named after him; how cool is that? ;) BOZ (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hugo Award for Best Professional Artist article notes his 8 wins, and has all the citations we could need. BOZ (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn OK, I'll stay away from Sci-fi articles in future. I had looked at the Hugo Award, but when I saw the Wordpress site and the web design, I gauged it for less notability than my esteemed colleagues above do. Article still only has three sources. Anyway, my mistake, apologies and withdrawn. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 13:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.