Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2006

Shortcuts

This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2006 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2006.

The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).

“

All sanctions and page restrictions must be logged by the administrator who applied the sanction or page restriction at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log. Whenever a sanction or page restriction is appealed or modified, the administrator amending it must append a note recording the amendment to the original log entry.

To be valid, sanctions must be clearly and unambiguously labelled as an arbitration enforcement action (such as with "arbitration enforcement", "arb enforcement", "AE" or "WP:AE" in the Wikipedia log entry or the edit summary). If a sanction has been logged as an arbitration enforcement action but has not been clearly labelled as an arbitration enforcement action any uninvolved administrator may amend the sanction (for example, a null edit or reblocking with the same settings) on behalf of the original administrator. Labelling a sanction which has been logged does not make the administrator who added the label the "enforcing administrator" unless there is confusion as to who intended the sanction be arbitration enforcement.

A central log of all page restrictions and sanctions (including blocks, bans, page protections or other restrictions) placed as arbitration enforcement (including contentious topic restrictions) is to be maintained by the Committee and its clerks at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log.

”

— Arbitration Committee Procedures on logging sanctions

Yearly Logs (Full Log)
2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 • 2007 • 2006 • 2005

2006

-Ril-

On 28 March, 2006, -Ril- (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was determined by the arbitration committee to be CheeseDreams evading her ban.

The -Ril- account was ordered to be blocked indefinitely and the Cheesedreams ban was extended for a further year. --Tony Sidaway 22:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-Ril-_2

22:22, March 28, 2006 Doc glasgow blocked "-Ril- (contribs)" with an expiry time of indefinite (per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/-Ril- 2)

8bitJake

19:22, 8 June 2006 William M. Connolley (talk · contribs) 8bitJake (talk · contribs)with an expiry time of 12 hours ‎ (3rr on Christine Gregoire) (Unblock)
21:59, 1 June 2006 AmiDaniel (talk · contribs) blocked 8bitJake (talk · contribs) with an expiry time of 48 hours ‎ (3RR violation on Henry M. Jackson immediately following expiration of previous block -- fourth offense) (Unblock)
19:00, 31 May 2006 Kcordina (talk · contribs) blocked 8bitJake (talk · contribs)with an expiry time of 24 hours ‎ (Contravention of WP:3RR on Henry M. Jackson despite explicit warning) (Unblock)
Bazzajf (talk · contribs) started back after a block with two aggressive and uncivil edits to Talk space: [1], [2]. Given the past history of gross incivility I did not like the way this was headed. His talk page was protected. I unprotected talk, which is what he apparently wanted, but blocked him pending some assurance that he is not here for the "ten pound argument". Blocked at 11:02, September 12, 2006. Not looking god right now, have asked around to see if I can't find him a supportive friend. Posted on admin noticeboard. Guy 22:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agapetos_angel

203.213.77.138 (talk · contribs) 22:23, 1 May 2006 Cyde blocked with an expiry time of 1 month as "Sock being used to circumvent an ArbCom decision" for POV editing of both Jonathan Sarfati and Answers in Genesis. On 00:18, 4 May 2006 Cyde re-blocked 203.213.77.138 (talk · contribs) with an expiry time of 5 days as "Reducing block to one week per ArbCom." In the interval between these blocks, FeloniousMonk, having not read the block log, also blocked 203.213.77.138 for the same reasons, then unblocked and reinstituted Cyde's block: [3] Reported by FeloniousMonk 15:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
58.162.234.115 (talk · contribs) Blocked for 24 hours for being in the named IP range earlier, POV edits to Creation-evolution controversy and associated articles, pushing Sarfati's views and ministry again. Block is only for 24 hours since the IP looks possibly shared. JoshuaZ 01:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
58.162.6.52 (talk · contribs) Blocked for 24 hours for being in the named IP range earlier, POV edits to Jonathan Sarfati, pushing Sarfati's spin of facts. Block is only for 24 hours since the IP looks possibly shared. FeloniousMonk 05:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
58.162.6.52 (talk · contribs) Back at it again. Blocked for another 24 hours per above. FeloniousMonk 19:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
58.162.2.131 (talk · contribs) blocked for 48 hours for editing Ken Ham. FeloniousMonk 18:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
58.162.2.131 (talk · contribs) again at Ken Ham, Carl Baugh and Creation science. 1 month. FeloniousMonk 16:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Ham, not part of the ARBCOM decision, was also not edited again after the previous block (notice the lack of diffs that would have substantiated his false claims), and Carl Baugh and Creation science were also not part of the ARBCOM. FeloniousMonk is abusing his authority by claiming everything is related back to this ARBCOM decision.

Diffs like this [4]? Ken Ham is clearly related to Jonathan Sarfati. What part of "banned from editing of Jonathan Sarfati and associated articles" is unclear? FeloniousMonk 02:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note the diff (Creation Science) doesn't match the claim that Ken Ham was edited again after the previous block. False reporting, then false evidence. Why is this person an administrator if he is going to lie to back up his biases? Ken Ham was not edited per above claim, and the other two were not part of this ARBCOM decision. What part of not everything is related because you can find degrees of separation is unclear?

58.162.2.122 (talk · contribs) with an expiry time of 24 hours for editing Jonathan Sarfati. JoshuaZ 08:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alienus

Al's block has been extended to permanent by Centrix (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) [5]. Sophia 20:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aucaman

User:Xebat:
- 20:01, 7 May 2006 Stifle blocked Xebat with an expiry time of 1 year (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Aucaman) Stifle (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 23:14, 7 May 2006 Tony Sidaway blocked Diyako with an expiry time of 365 days (This is banned user Xebat's other username. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Aucaman)

User:Aucaman
- 11 May 2006: Aucaman blocked for using Gadolam as a sock to breach remedy 1 [6]:
  - 22:21, 11 May 2006 Tony_Sidaway (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) unblocked Aucaman (to extend block for sock puppetry in order to breach ban (remedy 1) in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Aucaman)
  - 22:24, 11 May 2006 Tony Sidaway blocked "Aucaman (contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (Use of confirmed sock puppet User:Gadolam to evade ban--remedy 1
  - 22:23, 11 May 2006 Tony Sidaway blocked "Gadolam (contribs)" with an expiry time of indefinite (Confirmed sock puppet of User:Aucaman created to evade ban--remedy 1 in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Aucaman)
- 20 October 2006: Aucaman blocked for using multiple sock accounts to breach remedy 1
  - 23:31, 19 October 2006 Dmcdevit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) blocked JCMillion with an expiry time of indefinite (Aucaman sockpuppet evading article ban.)
  - 15:30, 20 October 2006 InShaneee (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) blocked Babayov with an expiry time of indefinite (Aucaman sockpuppet)
  - 15:30, 20 October 2006 InShaneee blocked Barookh with an expiry time of indefinite (Aucaman sockpuppet)
  - 15:58, 20 October 2006 InShaneee blocked Aucaman with an expiry time of one week (sockpuppetry, violation of arbcom probation)
  - 06:13, 5 November 2006 Dmcdevit blocked Ajooz with an expiry time of indefinite (Aucaman sockpuppet)
  - 09:15, 26 December 2006 Khoikhoi (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) blocked KingOfBeers with an expiry time of indefinite (Aucaman sockpuppet)

Benjamin_Gatti

I just blocked Benjamin Gatti for one week, per discussion at WP:AN and support of at least 3 uninvolved admins, among others.[7] I'm also uninvolved (until just now). The reason was his creation of Clean safe nuclear energy. -GTBacchus(talk) 03:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I banned Benjamin Gatti from both Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act and nuclear power, plus the accompaning talk pages due to disruptive editing logged here.--Sean Black (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked Benjamin Gatti for one week and banned him from Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi and Nuclear safety, plus the accompanying talk pages, due to disruptive editing logged here. --Sam Blanning (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blu_Aardvark

Ban reset to run for one year from today after he edited using unlogged-in IPs to evade the ban. [8] [9]. --Tony Sidaway 14:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boothy443

22:19, 2 June 2006 Musical Linguist blocked "Boothy443 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 days (Very nasty personal attack on User talk:Howcheng. Abusive towards other users who warned him.) The personal attack can be seen here. The warnings can be seen here; the abusive responses to other editors can be seen at [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. AnnH ♫ 17:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cantus_3

April 22, 2006, Heah (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) and Jacoplane (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) blocked Cantus for editing Developed country while banned. A difference over the block duration was resolved, and the block stood at 24 hours.
16:12, 23 April 2006 Tony_Sidaway (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) blocked Cantus with an expiry time of 1 month (Under enforcement clause 1.1 of Cantus 3, banned for one month for using verified sock to evade arbcom ban.)
- See notice on user's talk page for further details.
14:45, 25 April 2006 Tony Sidaway blocked Kiw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) with an expiry time of indefinite (Sock of Cantus used to evade one-month block)