Welcome!

edit

Hello, We are the Great, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Ravensfire (talk) 22:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to Temper (film)

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Temper (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

We are the Great, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi We are the Great! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dynamite (2015 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 17:40, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Signing messages and replying to other users

edit

Hi, please remember to sign your messages with four tildes like this: (~~~~). When replying to others, use the Template:Reply to. For instance, if you want to reply to my message you use {{ping|JackintheBox}} to notify me of your message (you don't have to do this on my talk page because I get an alert whenever someone edits my talk page). Replacing the 'ping' with 're', 'replyto' or 'yo' also works. Regards JACKINTHEBOXTALK 07:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please see Learning how to edit Wikipedia and add an article. for my response to your message. JACKINTHEBOXTALK 13:01, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Band Vaaje moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Band Vaaje, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Boelyn, I just don't know how to find and put a reliable source and put a poster in Wikipedia. Can you help me, please? We are the Great (talk) 14:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just fixed the infobox template in your draft and copyedited the plot. I suggest you should add some more reliable sources to support the subject's notability, using the Template:Cite web (this is used for sourced from the web, such as news articles). You can upload the film poster on Wikimedia Commons [1], then add the file name to your draft, but please see Wikipedia:Copyrights#Guidelines for images and other media files and Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images first. Regards JACKINTHEBOXTALK 10:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
When you think you are ready to submit your draft for review, add {{subst:submit}} to the draft. JACKINTHEBOXTALK 16:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi We are the Great! You created a thread called Needing help at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Laagi Tujhse Lagan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Action and Romance
Lakshya (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Romantic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Article 15 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mulk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sameer Anjaan (lyricist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aap Ki Khatir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bala (2019 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pakdam Pakdai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanjay Mishra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi We are the Great! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, uploading a poster, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi We are the Great! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Talk Page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi We are the Great! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, YouTube, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

edit

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Krack (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diffs: [2] We're not interested in editors' commentary being added into articles. Any opinion must be attributed to a reliable source. Also, you need to use proper encyclopedic tone, and describing his films as "flops" may not qualify. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for giving me the advice, because what I edited I believed as a fact that his previous movies being flops ended up being more as a commentary and an opinion, maybe since the reliable source that proved that the film was successful didn't show his film as a comeback. I will keep this in mind from now own. So what encyclopedic tone I should use to describe his previous films as flops? By the way, Happy Republic Day! We are the Great (talk) 21:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Happy Republic Day. You can describe his films as unsuccessful, but that analysis needs to be directly cited to a specific reliable published source. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of CID episodes: 2010–2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adaalat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hello We are the Great! The thread you created at the Teahouse, harv-error, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hello We are the Great! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Good article reassessment, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply