Talkback

edit

UVB-76 Discussion Page

edit

Hello, I've recently added some information at the UVB-76 Discussion Page that I would like some additional input on; as you've been fairly active with the article and discussion, your input would be appreciated. Aeternitas827 (talk) 06:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yo.

edit

OHAI! SpigotMap 22:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

hi2u Spacexplosion[talk] 22:37, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Update to Minecraft

edit

I didn't realize that the edit summary box was left blank, although the only thing I did was change the version numbers in the side info-box. I'll try to check the edit summary box to make sure there's something in it, although it can get troublesome when simply updating the version number(s). Xxcom9a (talk) 22:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello Dear Editor,

Indeed, our website has been reported as a spam when we've previously added it. We are very sorry about this and understand the policy of Wikipedia now.

But we'd like to keep a link to us on 'Steganography' page only because this is not an advertisement, but real scientific work that our community at Belarusian State University is doing during last 5 years. The next steps that we are going to execute based on our road map are to broadcast and share our knowledge with others who are interested in this area. As a first step the webinar has been executed in collaboration with IEEE Lithuanian section and Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. Our plans for next year(s) are to continue work in security area, to share our knowledge and to be joined with all interested people all over the world. That's the only reason we've decided to put a link on a Wikipedia site, as we'd like to connect our knowledge via that external link.

We hope that you will consider this as a proof of the only one goal - to leverage and share knowledge in steganography area.

Thanks for your review! Hope this will change a look to our scientific community web-portal from black to white.

Thanks and Kind Regards, ScientistBy Research Team (dr. Iryna Chvarkova, dr. Siarhei Tsikhanenka) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ByScientist (talkcontribs) 21:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The decision is not solely up to me. You need to seek consensus on the discussion page for the article. I'd advise you to review the manual of style pertaining to this subject and start a new section in Talk:Steganography. Spacexplosion[talk] 22:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Drosophilae im Deutschland sagen nichts voraus?

edit

Yes, fair point. And, of course, they can't even be occular yet can they, as the tournament has only just begun? But I think one might expect a few examples in that section which don't necessarily have their own wikipedia article. I must admit, I do see the fruit-flies as a Germanic postscript to Paul, and I think if anywhere that's where they belong. But we'll see, perhaps they'll just fly away. Another question, however - do you really see modern day oracular animals, such as Paul the Octopus, as appropriate examples of "Animal worship"? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reply. I quite agree. I have left a note at 2011 FIFA Women's World Cup, but am not sure that anything will come of it. But next stop - Drosophila, obviously! Being a trivia-troll has its downsides. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for teaching me a new word: voraussagen. Spacexplosion[talk] 19:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Bitte! wie vorausgesagt! Haha. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Ogcocephalus corniger.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Ogcocephalus corniger.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ogcocephalus corniger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batfish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

RfC: New helper policy

edit

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc)
Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Spacexplosion. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply