Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Come back I miss you :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:5D12:A85E:E537:7AD6:CEB9:C1D8 (talk) 22:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

DYK for New Columbia (Portland, Oregon)

edit

On 20 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article New Columbia (Portland, Oregon), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1988, Columbia Villa was the site of the first known drive-by shooting in Portland, Oregon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/New Columbia (Portland, Oregon). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, New Columbia (Portland, Oregon)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crayon (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pavement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sgt Mike Battle for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sgt Mike Battle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sgt Mike Battle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

FYI

edit

This has been restored Praxidicae (talk) 13:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fireal for Deletion

edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fireal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

Because you did some work on the page in the past, I thought you may have some existing knowledge. The nomination for deletion came up before the page had been updated. I am a new editor and a fan of the band, although I have no personal or professional relationship with them, and I have added new content along with citations. If you wish to participate in the discussion, the article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fireal Thanks. Dragonsnowballcat (talk) 03:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply