January 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to National Students' Union of India— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 23:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Buddha in a Traffic Jam, you may be blocked from editing. KNHaw (talk) 00:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Buddha in a Traffic Jam.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Buddha in a Traffic Jam was changed by Shibushivam (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937587 on 2018-01-23T00:13:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for deliberately introducing factual errors into articles, as you did at Malnutrition in India. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply