RyanJak
TimeSplitters: Future Perfect
editHi there RyanJak, welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately I have to ask you not to reinsert the information you're trying to put into the above article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and what you're trying to put in is trivia. I don't particularly feel that the encyclopedic value of the article is enhanced by knowing who a long-standing good player of the game was, it looks to me like self promotion, which is not what Wikipedia is for.
Please don't take this personally, I mean no offence at all and I look forward to seeing more of your edits, I'm just trying to explain why this particular addition isn't appropriate. Any questions, feel free to ask either here or at my talk page. Thanks, Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 00:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
editYou currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on TimeSplitters: Future Perfect. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kevin (talk) 02:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC) To be clear, you will be blocked on your next revert. I have been lenient here because you may not have been aware of the rules regarding edit warring. Kevin (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below. Kevin (talk) 02:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Ryan, you seem to have missed the point of my previous message, and the block you received. You need to stop blindly reverting at TimeSplitters: Future Perfect and start discussing your changes to Talk:TimeSplitters: Future Perfect. If you continue reverting, I will block you again, whether or not you technically violate the 3 revert rule. Kevin (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)