Peter.tarnopol

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Peter.tarnopol! Thank you for your contributions. I am WereSpielChequers and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

ϢereSpielChequers 17:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jason Ross Jallet

The article Jason Ross Jallet has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Monty₈₄₅ 23:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Anonymous Rudy S.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Anonymous Rudy S. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DoDo Bird Brain (talk) 03:42, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Woman of Ahhs

The article The Woman of Ahhs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoDo Bird Brain (talk) 03:46, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Anonymous Rudy S.

The article The Anonymous Rudy S. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One source is insufficient for notability. Even though the film is in pre-production, this is a case of WP:TOOSOON.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 04:34, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nortario Films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nortario Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 16:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ourson Films

A tag has been placed on Ourson Films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Anonymous Rudy S. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Anonymous Rudy S. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Anonymous Rudy S. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Nortario Films. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Nortario Films. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Nortario Films with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.Calabe1992 (talk) 19:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Woman of Ahhs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Woman of Ahhs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nortario Films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nortario Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Drmies (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The Anonynous Rudy S.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Anonynous Rudy S.. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The Anonymous Rudy S.. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Anonymous Rudy S. - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 21:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Woman of Ahhs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Woman of Ahhs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 02:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for adding spam. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 15:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

• The block also covers repeatedly and consistently advertising these films, by creation again and again of articles deleted for being overly promotional. Courcelles 15:31, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Peter.tarnopol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe blocking me was overkill, especially since the last version of text that I posted regarding The Woman of Ahhs was removed within seconds if not a minute or two of its posting, and so it was clearly not read by whomever deleted it. And blocking me because of "spam" is ridiculous. The Woman of Ahhs is the second part of a triptych of films by B. P. Paquette. The first and last parts of this triptych, A Year In the Death of Jack Richards (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Year_in_the_Death_of_Jack_Richards ), and The Anonymous Rudy S. (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anonymous_Rudy_S. ), respectively, are already entries on Wiki, so why wouldn't the second part also be listed? Furthermore, The Woman of Ahhs is an entry on IMDB (see: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0439882/ ). Please reconsider your decision to block me , and please reconsider what I am trying to post regarding The Woman of Ahhs. The following is what I am trying to post, and I believe it meets all Wiki requirements and is definitely not spam: The Woman of Ahhs is a 2008 dramatic comedy from Canada by filmmaker B. P. Paquette.?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000006-QINU?1?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000007-QINU? Based loosely on the The Wizard of Ahhs (1939 film), The Woman of Ahhs features the performance of original songs wherein the lyrics comment upon and propel the narrative, as do a triad of contemporary dances featuring nude performers in full body makeup (choreographed by Debra Brown of Cirque du Soleil).?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000009-QINU?2?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000000A-QINU? The Woman of Ahhs is the second panel in Paquette's triptych on "the psychology of romantic love,” preceded by A Year in the Death of Jack Richards (2004), and followed by The Anonymous Rudy S. (2012).?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000000C-QINU?3?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000000D-QINU? ==Plot== A professional musician in Toronto, Jude Garland, 33, has fallen under the spell of a beautiful young woman - a woman he has never met, but only observed via the Internet. Encouraged by sly documentary filmmaker Victoria Fleming, Jude is decides to track her down . His quest takes him to Montreal where his friend Billy introduces him to Raymonde, Jacklyn and Bertie, three musicians with whom he will have three conversations about romantic love. Although clues of every kind abound that the beautiful young woman is within reach, Jude's frustration mounts as he discovers that his reality is anything but objective. ?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000000F-QINU?4?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000010-QINU? ==Interpretations and allusions== The Woman of Ahhs is a weirdly insightful film about romantic love and the nature of media and consciousness itself, a kind of mockumentary with the added complication that the documentarian on-screen is not the director. ?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000012-QINU?5?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000013-QINU? Helen Faradji, film critic, editor-in-chief of 24 images wrote that The Woman of Ahhs is “mysterious and bizarre [...] Mixing reality, documentary and fiction but also having fun scrambling all reference points to time, the film takes as its starting point the classic The Wizard of Oz, and then layers in stylistic effects, mirror-within-mirror constructions and fantastical sequences to better puzzle us while we wander through this loveably bizarre dream world.” ==Festival Recognition== Premiering at Festival du Nouveau Cinéma where it was nominated for the Grand Prix Focus, The Woman of Ahhs was an official selection at numerous film festivals around the world, including Cinefest, the Sofia International Film Festival in Bulgaria, the European Independent Film Festival in Paris, France, where it was presented at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, and the Mexico International Film Festival where Paquette received the Bronze Palm Award.?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000015-QINU?6?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000016-QINU??UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000018-QINU?7?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000019-QINU??UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000001B-QINU?8?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000001C-QINU??UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000001E-QINU?9?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000001F-QINU??UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000021-QINU?10?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000022-QINU??UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000024-QINU?11?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000025-QINU??UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000027-QINU?12?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-00000028-QINU??UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000002A-QINU?13?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000002B-QINU??UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000002D-QINU?14?UNIQ35b3e88953748786-nowiki-0000002E-QINU? ==Theatrical Release== A commercial release in theatres across Canada is scheduled for 2012. ==Awards== *2005 B. P. Paquette won the Bronze Palm Award at Mexico International Film Festival ==External links== http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0439882/ Peter.tarnopol (talk) 19:09, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Block has expired on its own, so no action necessary. --Golbez (talk) 05:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

This talk concerns the feature film The Anonymous Rudy S. and why it should have an independent entry on Wiki instead of its current status as a redirect to the filmmaker's entry (i.e., B._P._Paquette#Filmmaking): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Anonymous_Rudy_S.

This film satisfies the criteria for an independent entry on Wiki, notably that it has not only screened publicly, but it opened the prestigious Cinema Summit program at Cinéfest, one of the largest, longest running, and most important film festivals in Canada (which is also the filmmaker's country of origin): http://www.northernlife.ca/mobile/displaymobilearticle.aspx?id=40212

Furthermore, this film is of other significance as it is the third and concluding chapter in the filmmaker's triptych on "the psychology of romantic love": http://www.thesudburystar.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2770031&archive=true

The filmmaker himself and the first two chapters of his triptych (i.e., A Year in the Death of Jack Richards, and The Woman of Ahhs: A Self-Portrait by Victoria Fleming, respectively), have each merited independent entries on Wiki, so denying the third and concluding chapter an independent entry is a severe oversight that must be corrected a.s.a.p.

Thank you in advance for your time and kind consideration. Peter.tarnopol (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited The Woman of Ahhs: A Self-Portrait by Victoria Fleming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concordia University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Nortario Films

A good article review found the mention of Nortario films to be considered too much detail for the main City of Sudbury page. I did a google search and found no movies produced by this company, very few google search results in general, and no IMDB references for films. There is also no wikipedia page for Nortario films (though twice it was determined that it was of too little significance and was removed). For these reasons I removed the reference. It can be added once the company indeed produces a film, ideally with a reference such as IMDB. Mattximus (talk) 00:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Greater Sudbury. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Dbrodbeck (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xanadu Studios.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Grayfell (talk) 02:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xanadu Studios concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xanadu Studios, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Xanadu Studios

Hello Peter.tarnopol. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Xanadu Studios.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xanadu Studios}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jason Ross Jallet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Ross Jallet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Ross Jallet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)